diff --git a/python/functions/datascience/automatic_eda/chapters/calidad.py b/python/functions/datascience/automatic_eda/chapters/calidad.py
index dcedcf6f..93ef9423 100644
--- a/python/functions/datascience/automatic_eda/chapters/calidad.py
+++ b/python/functions/datascience/automatic_eda/chapters/calidad.py
@@ -1,22 +1,26 @@
 """Data-quality chapter (CALIDAD) for AutomaticEDA.
 
 Builds the quality chapter from a ``TableProfile`` of the ``eda`` group. The
-chapter answers, in Spanish and as tables, the three things the user asked for:
+chapter implements the quality model of report 2046:
 
-1. **En qué se basa la calidad** — an intro paragraph explaining the criteria and
-   their weights (completeness, validity, consistency) before any number, plus a
-   table-level summary (global score and aggregates).
+1. **En qué se basa la calidad** — an intro paragraph explaining the two scored
+   dimensions and their weights (completitud 60%, validez 40%) plus the
+   table-level row uniqueness, BEFORE any number, and stating explicitly that
+   outliers are reported as observations and do **not** lower the score. The
+   criteria terms (calidad de datos, completitud, validez, unicidad de registro)
+   are hooked into the shared glossary as clickable jumps.
 2. **Scores por columna** — a table with, per column, the total quality score and
-   its breakdown into completeness / validity / consistency.
-3. **Problemas en español** — a second table listing, per column, the readable
-   issues in Spanish (kept separate from the type ``flags``).
+   its breakdown into completeness / validity (no consistency dimension).
+3. **Problemas de calidad** — a table listing ONLY real quality defects
+   (nulls, empty cells, values not conforming to their type/semantics).
+4. **Observaciones analíticas** — a SEPARATE table for outliers, constant
+   columns, high-cardinality ids and strong skew, with an explicit note that
+   these do not affect the score.
 
-The breakdown and the issues are NOT recomputed here: they come from the registry
-function ``column_quality_score`` (group ``eda``), which already derives
-``{score, completeness, validity, consistency, issues}`` from the ColumnProfile.
-This chapter is render-only — it consumes that function and lays the result out
-as model blocks; the renderers paginate tables (splitting by rows, repeating the
-header) and wrap long cells so nothing is ever cut.
+The breakdown, issues and observations are NOT recomputed here: they come from
+the registry function ``column_quality_score`` (group ``eda``), which derives
+``{score, completeness, validity, dimensions, applicable, issues,
+observations}`` from the ColumnProfile. This chapter is render-only.
 
 Contract: build_<id>(profile, ctx) -> Chapter | None ; CHAPTER_VERSION = "x.y.z".
 """
@@ -33,28 +37,47 @@ try:  # pragma: no cover - import wiring
 except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001 - never let an import error abort the document.
     _column_quality_score = None
 
-CHAPTER_VERSION = "1.0.0"
+CHAPTER_VERSION = "2.0.0"
 CHAPTER_ID = "calidad"
 CHAPTER_TITLE = "Calidad"
 
-# Weights mirror column_quality_score: completeness 0.5, validity 0.3,
-# consistency 0.2. Kept here only to render the human explanation; the actual
-# numbers always come from the function so the two never drift in computation.
-_CRITERIA_INTRO = (
-    "La calidad de cada columna es un score de 0 a 100 que combina tres "
-    "criterios, cada uno con un peso:\n\n"
-    "- **Completitud (peso 50%)**: proporción de valores presentes (sin nulos "
-    "ni vacíos). Una columna con muchos nulos baja de score.\n"
-    "- **Validez (peso 30%)**: los valores son coherentes con su tipo y rango "
-    "esperado (penaliza outliers y semánticas declaradas que no coinciden).\n"
-    "- **Consistencia (peso 20%)**: la columna aporta información útil (penaliza "
-    "columnas constantes o identificadores de cardinalidad muy alta).\n\n"
-    "Score = 100 × (0,5·completitud + 0,3·validez + 0,2·consistencia). "
-    "Los problemas detectados por columna se listan en español más abajo."
-)
+# Glossary terms this chapter explains (report 2046 §6). Registered in the shared
+# collector and marked clickable on their first appearance (contract §11.1).
+_TERMS = {
+    "calidad_datos": (
+        "Calidad de datos (score 0-100)",
+        "Mide hasta qué punto los datos están presentes y son utilizables tal "
+        "cual, no si son «buenos para el análisis». Se compone solo de "
+        "dimensiones medibles automáticamente desde el perfil de la tabla, sin "
+        "fuente externa de verdad: completitud (60%), validez (40%, cuando es "
+        "medible) y, a nivel de tabla, unicidad de registro. Los valores "
+        "atípicos NO bajan la calidad: se listan aparte como observaciones.",
+    ),
+    "completitud": (
+        "Completitud",
+        "Proporción de valores realmente presentes en una columna (1 − % de "
+        "nulos; en texto, las celdas vacías también cuentan como faltantes). Los "
+        "nulos y vacíos bajan el score porque falta información que debería "
+        "estar. Pesa el 60% del score de columna.",
+    ),
+    "validez": (
+        "Validez",
+        "Proporción de valores que encajan con su tipo o formato esperado: un "
+        "número que parsea, una fecha legible, un email con forma de email. Los "
+        "valores que no parsean a su tipo bajan el score. Si la columna es texto "
+        "libre sin formato esperado, la validez no se puede medir y el score se "
+        "basa solo en la completitud. Pesa el 40% del score cuando es medible.",
+    ),
+    "unicidad_registro": (
+        "Unicidad de registro",
+        "A nivel de tabla, las filas duplicadas restan calidad al conjunto "
+        "(1 − % de filas duplicadas). Es distinta de que una columna no-clave "
+        "repita valores, que no es un defecto de calidad.",
+    ),
+}
 
-# Cap for the joined issues cell so a single row never grows taller than a page;
-# the remainder is summarized as "(+N más)" instead of being silently dropped.
+# Cap for the joined cell so a single row never grows taller than a page; the
+# remainder is summarized as "(+N más)" instead of being silently dropped.
 _ISSUES_MAXLEN = 160
 
 
@@ -82,12 +105,19 @@ def _fmt_unit_pct(value) -> str:
         return str(value)
 
 
+def _fmt_validity(value) -> str:
+    """Validity is ``None`` when not applicable: show ``n/a`` not a fake 0%."""
+    if value is None:
+        return "n/a"
+    return _fmt_unit_pct(value)
+
+
 def _quality_of(col: dict) -> dict:
-    """Return ``{score, completeness, validity, consistency, issues}`` for a column.
+    """Return the quality dict for a column.
 
     Uses the registry ``column_quality_score`` when available; otherwise falls
     back to the per-column ``quality_score`` already in the profile (number only,
-    empty breakdown/issues). Never raises.
+    empty breakdown/issues/observations). Never raises.
     """
     if not isinstance(col, dict):
         col = {}
@@ -98,26 +128,25 @@ def _quality_of(col: dict) -> dict:
                 return res
         except Exception:  # noqa: BLE001 - degrade instead of aborting.
             pass
-    # Fallback: only the final score is available pre-computed in the profile.
     return {
         "score": col.get("quality_score"),
         "completeness": None,
         "validity": None,
-        "consistency": None,
         "issues": [],
+        "observations": [],
     }
 
 
-def _join_issues(issues) -> str:
-    """Join Spanish issue strings into one cell, truncating overly long lists.
+def _join_cells(items) -> str:
+    """Join Spanish strings into one cell, truncating overly long lists.
 
-    The renderer wraps cell text, but a column with many long issues could make a
-    single row taller than a whole page; cap the length and append ``(+N más)``
-    so the count of hidden issues is honest rather than silently lost.
+    The renderer wraps cell text, but a column with many long entries could make
+    a single row taller than a whole page; cap the length and append ``(+N más)``
+    so the count of hidden entries is honest rather than silently lost.
     """
-    if not isinstance(issues, (list, tuple)) or not issues:
+    if not isinstance(items, (list, tuple)) or not items:
         return ""
-    parts = [model._safe_str(i).strip() for i in issues]
+    parts = [model._safe_str(i).strip() for i in items]
     parts = [p for p in parts if p]
     if not parts:
         return ""
@@ -142,6 +171,33 @@ def _columns_with_quality(profile: dict):
             yield c, _quality_of(c)
 
 
+def _fmt_unit_pct_or_pct(value) -> str:
+    """Format a value that may be a 0-1 fraction or an already-0-100 percentage."""
+    try:
+        num = float(value)
+    except (TypeError, ValueError):
+        return model._safe_str(value)
+    if num != num:  # NaN
+        return "—"
+    pct = num * 100 if num <= 1.0 else num
+    text = f"{pct:.1f}".rstrip("0").rstrip(".")
+    return f"{text}%"
+
+
+def _row_uniqueness(profile: dict):
+    """Return row uniqueness (1 - duplicate_pct) in [0,1], or None if unknown."""
+    dup = profile.get("duplicate_pct")
+    if dup is None:
+        return None
+    try:
+        d = float(dup)
+    except (TypeError, ValueError):
+        return None
+    if d > 1.0:  # tolerate a 0-100 scale
+        d = d / 100.0
+    return max(0.0, min(1.0, 1.0 - d))
+
+
 def _summary_block(profile: dict, evaluated: list):
     """Table-level KVTable: global score and quality aggregates."""
     rows = []
@@ -153,14 +209,15 @@ def _summary_block(profile: dict, evaluated: list):
              if isinstance(q.get("completeness"), (int, float))]
     vals = [q.get("validity") for _, q in evaluated
             if isinstance(q.get("validity"), (int, float))]
-    cons = [q.get("consistency") for _, q in evaluated
-            if isinstance(q.get("consistency"), (int, float))]
     if comps:
         rows.append(("Completitud media", _fmt_unit_pct(sum(comps) / len(comps))))
     if vals:
-        rows.append(("Validez media", _fmt_unit_pct(sum(vals) / len(vals))))
-    if cons:
-        rows.append(("Consistencia media", _fmt_unit_pct(sum(cons) / len(cons))))
+        rows.append(("Validez media (donde aplica)",
+                     _fmt_unit_pct(sum(vals) / len(vals))))
+
+    ru = _row_uniqueness(profile)
+    if ru is not None:
+        rows.append(("Unicidad de registro", _fmt_unit_pct(ru)))
 
     n_problem = sum(1 for _, q in evaluated if q.get("issues"))
     rows.append(("Columnas con problemas", str(n_problem)))
@@ -182,22 +239,9 @@ def _summary_block(profile: dict, evaluated: list):
     return model.KVTable(rows=rows, title="Resumen de calidad")
 
 
-def _fmt_unit_pct_or_pct(value) -> str:
-    """Format a value that may be a 0-1 fraction or an already-0-100 percentage."""
-    try:
-        num = float(value)
-    except (TypeError, ValueError):
-        return model._safe_str(value)
-    if num != num:  # NaN
-        return "—"
-    pct = num * 100 if num <= 1.0 else num
-    text = f"{pct:.1f}".rstrip("0").rstrip(".")
-    return f"{text}%"
-
-
 def _scores_block(evaluated: list):
-    """DataTable with per-column score and its three-criteria breakdown."""
-    header = ["Columna", "Calidad", "Completitud", "Validez", "Consistencia"]
+    """DataTable with per-column score and its completeness/validity breakdown."""
+    header = ["Columna", "Calidad", "Completitud", "Validez"]
     rows = []
     # Worst columns first so the reader sees the problems at the top.
     ordered = sorted(
@@ -210,22 +254,22 @@ def _scores_block(evaluated: list):
             col.get("name") or "(col)",
             _fmt_score(q.get("score")),
             _fmt_unit_pct(q.get("completeness")),
-            _fmt_unit_pct(q.get("validity")),
-            _fmt_unit_pct(q.get("consistency")),
+            _fmt_validity(q.get("validity")),
         ])
     if not rows:
         return None
     return model.DataTable(header=header, rows=rows,
                            title="Scores de calidad por columna",
-                           note="0 = peor, 100 = mejor; ordenado de peor a mejor")
+                           note="0 = peor, 100 = mejor; «n/a» = dimensión no "
+                                "medible; ordenado de peor a mejor")
 
 
 def _issues_block(evaluated: list):
-    """DataTable listing Spanish issues per column, or a Note when there are none."""
-    header = ["Columna", "Problemas detectados (español)"]
+    """DataTable listing ONLY real quality defects per column, or a Note."""
+    header = ["Columna", "Problemas de calidad (español)"]
     rows = []
     for col, q in evaluated:
-        joined = _join_issues(q.get("issues"))
+        joined = _join_cells(q.get("issues"))
         if joined:
             rows.append([col.get("name") or "(col)", joined])
     if not rows:
@@ -235,6 +279,63 @@ def _issues_block(evaluated: list):
                            title="Problemas de calidad por columna")
 
 
+def _observations_block(evaluated: list):
+    """DataTable listing analytical observations per column, or None.
+
+    Observations (outliers, constant columns, ids, strong skew) are NOT quality
+    defects: they do not affect the score. Returned as a separate table from the
+    issues so the report never presents a legitimate outlier as a problem.
+    """
+    header = ["Columna", "Observaciones analíticas"]
+    rows = []
+    for col, q in evaluated:
+        joined = _join_cells(q.get("observations"))
+        if joined:
+            rows.append([col.get("name") or "(col)", joined])
+    if not rows:
+        return None
+    return model.DataTable(
+        header=header, rows=rows,
+        title="Observaciones analíticas por columna",
+        note="No son defectos de calidad y NO afectan al score; orientan el "
+             "análisis (atípicos, columnas constantes, identificadores).")
+
+
+def _term(key: str, label: str, mark: bool) -> str:
+    """Render a term as a clickable glossary span when marking is enabled."""
+    if mark:
+        return f"[[term:{key}]]**{label}**[[/term]]"
+    return f"**{label}**"
+
+
+def _criteria_intro(mark: bool) -> str:
+    """Intro paragraph explaining the two scored dimensions and the principle."""
+    calidad = _term("calidad_datos", "calidad de datos", mark)
+    completitud = _term("completitud", "Completitud (peso 60%)", mark)
+    validez = _term("validez", "Validez (peso 40%, cuando es medible)", mark)
+    unicidad = _term("unicidad_registro", "unicidad de registro", mark)
+    return (
+        f"La {calidad} de cada columna es un score de 0 a 100 que combina solo "
+        "dimensiones medibles desde el perfil de la tabla, sin fuente externa "
+        "de verdad:\n\n"
+        f"- {completitud}: proporción de valores presentes (1 − % de nulos; en "
+        "texto, las celdas vacías cuentan como faltantes). Los nulos y vacíos "
+        "bajan el score.\n"
+        f"- {validez}: proporción de valores que encajan con su tipo o formato "
+        "(un número que parsea, una fecha legible, un email con forma de email). "
+        "Si una columna es texto libre sin formato esperado, la validez no se "
+        "mide y el score se basa solo en la completitud.\n\n"
+        f"Score de columna = 100 × (0,6·completitud + 0,4·validez), "
+        "renormalizado cuando la validez no aplica. A nivel de tabla se añade "
+        f"la {unicidad} (1 − % de filas duplicadas).\n\n"
+        "**Los valores atípicos (outliers) NO bajan la calidad.** Un valor "
+        "extremo puede ser real y correcto; detectar atípicos es parte del "
+        "análisis de la distribución, no un juicio de corrección. Por eso, junto "
+        "con las columnas constantes y los identificadores, se listan aparte "
+        "como **observaciones analíticas** que no afectan al score."
+    )
+
+
 def build_calidad(profile: dict, ctx: dict):
     """Build the data-quality Chapter, or None if the profile has no columns.
 
@@ -250,17 +351,35 @@ def build_calidad(profile: dict, ctx: dict):
     if not evaluated:
         return None  # no columns to score -> chapter does not apply.
 
+    # Register the criteria terms in the shared glossary (if present) and mark
+    # their first appearance clickable. Contract §11.1.
+    glossary = ctx.get("glossary")
+    mark = False
+    if isinstance(glossary, model.GlossaryCollector):
+        for key, (label, definition) in _TERMS.items():
+            glossary.add(key, label, definition)
+        mark = True
+
     blocks = [
         model.Heading(text="Cómo se calcula la calidad", level=2),
-        model.Markdown(text=_CRITERIA_INTRO),
+        model.Markdown(text=_criteria_intro(mark)),
         _summary_block(profile, evaluated),
         model.Heading(text="Scores por columna", level=2),
     ]
     scores = _scores_block(evaluated)
     if scores is not None:
         blocks.append(scores)
-    blocks.append(model.Heading(text="Problemas detectados", level=2))
+
+    blocks.append(model.Heading(text="Problemas de calidad", level=2))
     blocks.append(_issues_block(evaluated))
 
+    observations = _observations_block(evaluated)
+    if observations is not None:
+        blocks.append(model.Heading(text="Observaciones analíticas", level=2))
+        blocks.append(model.Note(
+            "Las observaciones siguientes NO son defectos de calidad y no "
+            "afectan al score: son señales para orientar el análisis."))
+        blocks.append(observations)
+
     return model.Chapter(id=CHAPTER_ID, title=CHAPTER_TITLE,
                          version=CHAPTER_VERSION, blocks=blocks)
diff --git a/python/functions/datascience/automatic_eda/chapters/calidad_test.py b/python/functions/datascience/automatic_eda/chapters/calidad_test.py
index 3e6bf5f6..5dc623ee 100644
--- a/python/functions/datascience/automatic_eda/chapters/calidad_test.py
+++ b/python/functions/datascience/automatic_eda/chapters/calidad_test.py
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
-"""Tests for the CALIDAD chapter — DoD: golden + edges + anti-cut.
+"""Tests for the CALIDAD chapter — DoD: golden + edges + anti-cut + glossary.
 
 Self-contained: builds synthetic TableProfiles (no DuckDB) so the suite is fast
-and deterministic. Verifies that the chapter explains the quality criteria, shows
-per-column scores with the completeness/validity/consistency breakdown, lists the
-issues in Spanish (separate from the type flags), returns None when it does not
-apply, and that a wide profile with long names renders to PDF and PPTX without
-cutting any cell text (long content wraps, it is never truncated).
+and deterministic. Verifies the report-2046 quality model: the chapter explains
+the two scored dimensions (completitud 60% / validez 40%), shows per-column
+scores without a consistency column, keeps quality DEFECTS (issues) separate
+from analytical OBSERVATIONS (outliers, constant, ids), hooks the criteria terms
+into the glossary, returns None when it does not apply, and renders a wide
+profile to PDF and PPTX without cutting any cell text.
 """
 
 import os
@@ -20,28 +21,30 @@ from datascience.automatic_eda.chapters.calidad import (
     CHAPTER_VERSION,
 )
 from datascience.automatic_eda import build_document, render_pdf, render_pptx
+from datascience.automatic_eda import model
 
 
 def _profile() -> dict:
     """A small profile with one column per quality problem (nulls, outliers,
-    constant, high-cardinality id) plus one clean column."""
+    constant, high-cardinality id) plus one clean column. ``outlier_pct`` is in
+    the 0-100 scale that describe_numeric actually emits."""
     return {
         "table": "demo",
-        "quality_score": 72.5,
+        "quality_score": 82.0,
         "duplicate_pct": 0.04,
         "null_cell_pct": 0.11,
         "constant_cols": ["flag_const"],
         "all_null_cols": [],
         "columns": [
-            {"name": "edad", "inferred_type": "integer", "null_pct": 0.2,
-             "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 0.15, "min": 0, "max": 99},
-             "quality_score": 60},
+            {"name": "edad", "inferred_type": "numeric", "null_pct": 0.2,
+             "n_rows": 100, "unique_pct": 0.5,
+             "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 15.0, "min": 0, "max": 99}},
             {"name": "nombre", "inferred_type": "text", "null_pct": 0.0,
-             "unique_pct": 0.98, "quality_score": 80},
+             "unique_pct": 0.98, "flags": ["possible_id"]},
             {"name": "flag_const", "inferred_type": "text", "null_pct": 0.0,
-             "flags": ["constant"], "quality_score": 50},
-            {"name": "limpia", "inferred_type": "float", "null_pct": 0.0,
-             "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 0.0}, "quality_score": 100},
+             "unique_pct": 0.01, "flags": ["constant"]},
+            {"name": "limpia", "inferred_type": "numeric", "null_pct": 0.0,
+             "unique_pct": 0.5, "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 0.0}},
         ],
     }
 
@@ -50,16 +53,9 @@ def _tables(chapter):
     return [b for b in chapter.blocks if getattr(b, "kind", None) == "data_table"]
 
 
-def _scores_table(chapter):
+def _table_by_title(chapter, needle):
     for t in _tables(chapter):
-        if "Scores" in (t.title or ""):
-            return t
-    return None
-
-
-def _issues_table(chapter):
-    for t in _tables(chapter):
-        if "Problemas" in (t.title or ""):
+        if needle in (t.title or ""):
             return t
     return None
 
@@ -73,41 +69,84 @@ def test_golden_chapter_estructura_y_version():
     assert ch.id == "calidad"
     assert ch.version == CHAPTER_VERSION
     kinds = [b.kind for b in ch.blocks]
-    # intro heading + markdown criteria + summary kv + scores table + issues table
     assert "markdown" in kinds and "kv_table" in kinds and "data_table" in kinds
 
 
-def test_golden_intro_explica_criterios_y_pesos():
+def test_golden_intro_explica_dos_dimensiones_y_pesos():
     ch = build_calidad(_profile(), {})
     intro = [b for b in ch.blocks if b.kind == "markdown"][0].text
-    for needle in ("Completitud", "Validez", "Consistencia",
-                   "50%", "30%", "20%"):
+    for needle in ("Completitud", "Validez", "60%", "40%",
+                   "unicidad de registro"):
         assert needle in intro, f"falta {needle!r} en la intro de criterios"
+    # El principio: los outliers NO bajan la calidad.
+    assert "atípicos" in intro and "NO bajan" in intro
+    # Ya no se menciona la dimensión consistencia eliminada.
+    assert "20%" not in intro
 
 
-def test_golden_scores_incluyen_desglose_por_criterio():
+def test_golden_scores_sin_columna_consistencia():
     ch = build_calidad(_profile(), {})
-    scores = _scores_table(ch)
+    scores = _table_by_title(ch, "Scores")
     assert scores is not None
-    assert scores.header == ["Columna", "Calidad", "Completitud",
-                             "Validez", "Consistencia"]
-    # 4 columns scored, none dropped.
+    assert scores.header == ["Columna", "Calidad", "Completitud", "Validez"]
+    assert "Consistencia" not in scores.header
     assert len(scores.rows) == 4
     names = {r[0] for r in scores.rows}
     assert names == {"edad", "nombre", "flag_const", "limpia"}
 
 
-def test_golden_issues_en_espanol_separados_de_flags():
+def test_golden_outliers_en_observaciones_no_en_problemas():
     ch = build_calidad(_profile(), {})
-    issues = _issues_table(ch)
-    assert issues is not None
-    flat = " | ".join(" ".join(r) for r in issues.rows)
-    assert "nulos" in flat            # completeness issue (ES)
-    assert "outliers" in flat         # validity issue (ES)
-    assert "columna constante" in flat
-    assert "posible id de alta cardinalidad" in flat
-    # The raw type flag string must NOT leak as a "problem".
-    assert "constant" not in flat or "columna constante" in flat
+    problemas = _table_by_title(ch, "Problemas de calidad")
+    observaciones = _table_by_title(ch, "Observaciones")
+    assert problemas is not None
+    assert observaciones is not None
+
+    problemas_txt = " | ".join(" ".join(r) for r in problemas.rows)
+    observaciones_txt = " | ".join(" ".join(r) for r in observaciones.rows)
+
+    # Los nulos SÍ son problema de calidad.
+    assert "nulos" in problemas_txt
+    # Los outliers NO aparecen como problema...
+    assert "atípic" not in problemas_txt and "outlier" not in problemas_txt
+    # ...sino como observación analítica.
+    assert "atípic" in observaciones_txt
+    # Constante e id: observaciones, no problemas.
+    assert "constante" in observaciones_txt
+    assert "identificador" in observaciones_txt
+    assert "constante" not in problemas_txt
+
+
+def test_golden_score_columna_limpia_es_100():
+    """Columna sin nulos, numérica nativa: score 100 aunque tenga (o no) outliers."""
+    ch = build_calidad(_profile(), {})
+    scores = _table_by_title(ch, "Scores")
+    by_name = {r[0]: r for r in scores.rows}
+    assert by_name["limpia"][1] == "100 / 100"
+    # edad: 20% nulos -> 100*(0.6*0.8 + 0.4*1.0) = 88; los outliers no bajan nada.
+    assert by_name["edad"][1] == "88 / 100"
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# Glosario (contrato §11.1)
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_glosario_registra_los_cuatro_terminos_y_marca_clicable():
+    glossary = model.GlossaryCollector()
+    ch = build_calidad(_profile(), {"glossary": glossary})
+    for key in ("calidad_datos", "completitud", "validez", "unicidad_registro"):
+        assert glossary.has(key), f"término {key!r} no registrado en el glosario"
+    intro = [b for b in ch.blocks if b.kind == "markdown"][0].text
+    # Con colector presente, la primera aparición se marca clicable.
+    assert "[[term:completitud]]" in intro
+    assert "[[term:validez]]" in intro
+    assert "[[term:calidad_datos]]" in intro
+    assert "[[term:unicidad_registro]]" in intro
+
+
+def test_sin_glosario_no_marca_terminos():
+    ch = build_calidad(_profile(), {})  # ctx sin glossary
+    intro = [b for b in ch.blocks if b.kind == "markdown"][0].text
+    assert "[[term:" not in intro
 
 
 # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
@@ -124,17 +163,17 @@ def test_edge_perfil_limpio_sin_problemas_usa_nota():
     prof = {
         "quality_score": 100,
         "columns": [
-            {"name": "a", "inferred_type": "float", "null_pct": 0.0,
-             "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 0.0}},
-            {"name": "b", "inferred_type": "float", "null_pct": 0.0,
-             "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 0.0}},
+            {"name": "a", "inferred_type": "numeric", "null_pct": 0.0,
+             "unique_pct": 0.5, "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 0.0}},
+            {"name": "b", "inferred_type": "numeric", "null_pct": 0.0,
+             "unique_pct": 0.5, "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 0.0}},
         ],
     }
     ch = build_calidad(prof, {})
     assert ch is not None
-    assert _issues_table(ch) is None  # no issues table
+    assert _table_by_title(ch, "Problemas de calidad") is None  # no issues table
     notes = [b for b in ch.blocks if b.kind == "note"]
-    assert notes and "No se detectaron problemas" in notes[0].text
+    assert any("No se detectaron problemas" in n.text for n in notes)
 
 
 # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
@@ -143,44 +182,42 @@ def test_edge_perfil_limpio_sin_problemas_usa_nota():
 def _wide_profile(ncols: int = 22) -> dict:
     cols = [
         {"name": "identificador_unico_de_transaccion_con_nombre_muy_largo",
-         "inferred_type": "text", "null_pct": 0.0, "unique_pct": 0.99},
+         "inferred_type": "text", "null_pct": 0.0, "unique_pct": 0.99,
+         "flags": ["possible_id"]},
         {"name": "columna_constante_sin_ninguna_variacion_de_valor",
-         "inferred_type": "text", "null_pct": 0.0, "flags": ["constant"]},
+         "inferred_type": "text", "null_pct": 0.0, "unique_pct": 0.01,
+         "flags": ["constant"]},
     ]
     for k in range(ncols - 2):
         cols.append({
             "name": f"metrica_numerica_de_negocio_{k:02d}_con_nombre_largo",
-            "inferred_type": "float", "null_pct": 0.1 + (k % 3) * 0.05,
-            "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 0.08, "min": 0, "max": 1000},
+            "inferred_type": "numeric", "null_pct": 0.1 + (k % 3) * 0.05,
+            "unique_pct": 0.5,
+            "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 8.0, "min": 0, "max": 1000},
         })
-    return {"table": "ancha", "quality_score": 70.0, "columns": cols}
+    return {"table": "ancha", "quality_score": 70.0, "duplicate_pct": 0.0,
+            "columns": cols}
 
 
 def test_anticut_pdf_y_pptx_no_truncan_nombres_largos():
     prof = _wide_profile(22)
     full = build_document(prof, {"dataset_name": "ancha"})
     assert any(c.id == "calidad" for c in full)
-    # Render ONLY the calidad chapter so the anti-cut assertions are scoped to
-    # this chapter (other chapters, e.g. portada, legitimately contain '…').
     chapters = [c for c in full if c.id == "calidad"]
     long_name = "metrica_numerica_de_negocio_00_con_nombre_largo"
     with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as d:
         pdf = os.path.join(d, "q.pdf")
         pptx = os.path.join(d, "q.pptx")
         rp = render_pdf(chapters, pdf, {"title": "EDA"})
-        rx = render_pptx(chapters, pptx, {"title": "EDA"})
+        render_pptx(chapters, pptx, {"title": "EDA"})
         assert os.path.exists(pdf) and os.path.exists(pptx)
-        # The wide table forces pagination across several pages/slides.
         assert (rp or {}).get("n_pages", 0) >= 2
 
-        # PDF: the long name survives whole once wraps (spaces/newlines) removed,
-        # and there is no truncation marker.
         pdf_txt = "".join((pg.extract_text() or "") for pg in PdfReader(pdf).pages)
         assert "…" not in pdf_txt and "..." not in pdf_txt
         norm = re.sub(r"\s+", "", pdf_txt)
         assert long_name in norm, "el nombre largo se cortó en el PDF"
 
-        # PPTX: long name present in some cell, untruncated.
         allt = []
         for s in Presentation(pptx).slides:
             for sh in s.shapes:
diff --git a/python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score.md b/python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score.md
index 2e5fa7af..0a33f60d 100644
--- a/python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score.md
+++ b/python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score.md
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ name: column_quality_score
 kind: function
 lang: py
 domain: datascience
-version: "1.0.0"
+version: "2.0.0"
 purity: pure
 signature: "def column_quality_score(col: dict) -> dict"
-description: "Calcula un score de calidad de datos 0-100 para un ColumnProfile del grupo eda, con desglose completeness/validity/consistency y lista de issues legibles. Funcion pura, no muta el input."
+description: "Calcula un score de calidad de datos 0-100 para un ColumnProfile del grupo eda. Combina completeness (0.6) y validity (0.4) con renormalizacion por aplicabilidad; los outliers, columnas constantes e ids NO bajan el score (van a observations). Devuelve desglose por dimension, issues (defectos) y observations (señales analiticas). Funcion pura, no muta el input."
 tags: [eda, data-quality, profiling, scoring, datascience]
 uses_functions: []
 uses_types: []
@@ -17,20 +17,26 @@ error_type: ""
 imports: []
 example: |
   from datascience import column_quality_score
-  col = {"name": "precio", "inferred_type": "float", "null_pct": 0.2,
-         "unique_pct": 0.4, "flags": [], "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 0.08}}
+  col = {"name": "precio", "inferred_type": "numeric", "null_pct": 0.2,
+         "unique_pct": 0.4, "flags": [], "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 8.0}}
   column_quality_score(col)
-  # {"score": 86.8, "completeness": 0.8, "validity": 0.92,
-  #  "consistency": 1.0, "issues": ["20% nulos", "8% outliers"]}
+  # {"score": 88.0, "completeness": 0.8, "validity": 1.0,
+  #  "applicable": ["completeness", "validity"], "issues": ["20% nulos"],
+  #  "observations": ["8% de valores atípicos (z-score>3): ..."]}
 tested: true
 tests:
   - "test_clean_column_high_score"
-  - "test_half_null_lowers_completeness_and_score"
-  - "test_constant_column_flags_issue"
+  - "test_weights_60_40_native_type"
+  - "test_outliers_do_not_penalize_score"
+  - "test_nulls_lower_score_more_than_outliers"
+  - "test_validity_from_parse_rate_lowers_score"
+  - "test_validity_from_match_rate"
+  - "test_free_text_renormalizes_to_completeness_only"
+  - "test_all_null_column_scores_zero"
+  - "test_constant_column_scores_full_and_is_observation"
+  - "test_high_cardinality_id_scores_full_and_is_observation"
+  - "test_mostly_null_no_double_counts_validity"
   - "test_empty_dict_does_not_crash"
-  - "test_outliers_penalize_validity"
-  - "test_mostly_null_flag_halves_validity"
-  - "test_high_cardinality_text_flagged_as_id"
   - "test_none_values_treated_defensively"
   - "test_does_not_mutate_input"
 test_file_path: "python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score_test.py"
@@ -38,16 +44,22 @@ file_path: "python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score.py"
 params:
   - name: col
     desc: >
-      ColumnProfile dict del grupo eda (p.ej. salida de summarize_table_duckdb).
-      Se leen sus claves de forma defensiva con .get(...) y se toleran valores
-      None. Claves usadas: null_pct (0-1), inferred_type, semantic_type,
-      unique_pct (0-1), flags (list[str], reconoce "constant"/"mostly_null"),
-      numeric ({outlier_pct: 0-1, ...}|None) y match_rate (opcional, 0-1).
+      ColumnProfile dict del grupo eda (p.ej. salida de summarize_table_duckdb /
+      profile_table). Se leen sus claves de forma defensiva con .get(...) y se
+      toleran valores None. Claves usadas: null_pct (0-1), n_rows, empty_count
+      (texto), inferred_type, semantic_type, validity_rate (0-1, lo expone
+      profile_table al promocionar texto a numero/fecha), match_rate (0-1),
+      unique_pct (0-1), flags (list[str], reconoce
+      "constant"/"possible_id"/"high_cardinality") y numeric ({outlier_pct: 0-100,
+      skew, ...}|None).
 output: >
-  dict con score (float 0-100, redondeado a 1 decimal), completeness (0-1),
-  validity (0-1), consistency (0-1) e issues (list[str] de descripciones
-  legibles de los problemas detectados). score = round(100 * (0.5*completeness
-  + 0.3*validity + 0.2*consistency), 1).
+  dict con score (float 0-100, 1 decimal), completeness (0-1), validity (0-1 o
+  None si no aplicable), dimensions ({completeness, validity}), applicable
+  (list[str] de dimensiones que entraron en el score), issues (list[str] SOLO de
+  defectos de calidad: nulos, vacios, valores no conformes) y observations
+  (list[str] de señales analiticas que NO bajan el score: outliers, columna
+  constante, posible id, asimetria). score = round(100 * (0.6*completeness +
+  0.4*validity) / pesos_aplicables, 1), renormalizado cuando validity no aplica.
 ---
 
 ## Ejemplo
@@ -59,51 +71,71 @@ from datascience import column_quality_score
 col = {
     "name": "precio",
     "physical_type": "DOUBLE",
-    "inferred_type": "float",
+    "inferred_type": "numeric",
     "semantic_type": "",
-    "count": 800,
     "n_rows": 1000,
     "null_count": 200,
     "null_pct": 0.20,
     "distinct_count": 400,
     "unique_pct": 0.40,
     "flags": [],
-    "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 0.08},
+    "numeric": {"outlier_pct": 8.0, "skew": 0.3},
     "categorical": None,
     "datetime": None,
 }
 
 column_quality_score(col)
 # {
-#   "score": 86.8,
-#   "completeness": 0.8,    # 1 - 0.20
-#   "validity": 0.92,       # 1 - min(0.08, 0.3)
-#   "consistency": 1.0,
-#   "issues": ["20% nulos", "8% outliers"],
+#   "score": 88.0,            # 100 * (0.6*0.8 + 0.4*1.0)
+#   "completeness": 0.8,      # 1 - 0.20
+#   "validity": 1.0,          # numerica nativa: el tipo es conforme
+#   "dimensions": {"completeness": 0.8, "validity": 1.0},
+#   "applicable": ["completeness", "validity"],
+#   "issues": ["20% nulos"],                       # SOLO defectos de calidad
+#   "observations": ["8% de valores atípicos (z-score>3): ..."],  # NO bajan score
 # }
 ```
 
 ## Cuando usarla
 
 Cuando hayas perfilado una tabla con el grupo `eda` (p.ej.
-`summarize_table_duckdb`) y necesites un numero 0-100 por columna para
-ordenar/priorizar limpieza de datos, pintar semaforos de calidad en un
-dashboard, o decidir que columnas descartar antes de modelar. Es la capa de
-scoring sobre el ColumnProfile crudo: lee el perfil, no toca los datos.
+`summarize_table_duckdb` / `profile_table`) y necesites un numero 0-100 por
+columna para ordenar/priorizar limpieza de datos, pintar semaforos de calidad,
+o decidir que columnas descartar antes de modelar. Separa los **defectos de
+calidad reales** (`issues`: nulos, vacios, valores que no parsean a su tipo) de
+las **observaciones analiticas** (`observations`: outliers, columnas constantes,
+ids), que se reportan pero no penalizan. Es la capa de scoring sobre el
+ColumnProfile crudo: lee el perfil, no toca los datos.
 
-## Notas
+## Gotchas
 
-Funcion pura, sin I/O ni dependencias externas, no muta `col`. Lee todas las
-claves con `.get(...)` y tolera que vengan en `None` (un ColumnProfile recien
-salido de `summarize_table_duckdb` trae muchas claves a `None`), por lo que
-nunca falla por claves ausentes — un `{}` produce un resultado bien definido.
+Funcion pura, sin I/O, no muta `col`. Aun asi conviene saber:
 
-Pesos del score: completeness 0.5, validity 0.3, consistency 0.2.
+- **Los outliers NO bajan el score.** Un valor extremo puede ser real y correcto
+  (un cliente que compra mucho); detectar atipicos es analisis de la
+  distribucion, no un juicio de correccion. Salen en `observations`, no en
+  `issues`. Mismo trato para columnas constantes e identificadores de alta
+  cardinalidad: son observaciones, no defectos.
+- **`validity` puede ser `None`** (no aplicable): texto libre sin `semantic_type`
+  ni `validity_rate`, o columna 100% nula. En ese caso el score se renormaliza a
+  solo `completeness` (la columna no se premia ni castiga por algo no medible).
+- **`outlier_pct` se interpreta en escala 0-100** (la que emite
+  `describe_numeric`, z-score>3). Pasar una fraccion 0-1 produce un texto de
+  observacion con el % equivocado, pero NUNCA afecta al score.
+- **`validity_rate` lo puebla `profile_table`** al promocionar una columna de
+  texto a numero/fecha (fraccion que parsea). Si no esta presente y el tipo es
+  nativo numerico/fecha/bool, `validity = 1.0`.
+- Sin doble conteo: la falta de datos cuenta solo en `completeness` (el antiguo
+  castigo de `mostly_null` sobre `validity` se elimino).
 
-- **completeness** = `1 - null_pct` (None -> 0 nulls -> 1.0).
-- **validity**: parte de 1.0 y penaliza `min(outlier_pct, 0.3)` en columnas
-  numericas, `0.5 * (1 - match_rate)` si hay `semantic_type` declarado con
-  `match_rate` bajo disponible, y multiplica por 0.5 si el flag `mostly_null`
-  esta presente.
-- **consistency**: 1.0 salvo flag `constant` (-> 0.3, columna poco informativa)
-  o texto con `unique_pct > 0.9` (-> 0.6, posible id de alta cardinalidad).
+## Capability growth log
+
+- v2.0.0 (2026-06-30) — nueva formula de calidad (report 2046): pesos 60/40
+  (completeness/validity) con renormalizacion por aplicabilidad; se elimina la
+  dimension `consistency`-como-informatividad y el doble castigo de
+  `mostly_null`; los outliers/constantes/ids salen del score a `observations`;
+  validity mide conformidad real (parse rate / match rate / tipo nativo). Salida
+  ampliada con `dimensions`, `applicable` y `observations`.
+- v1.0.0 — version inicial: pesos 50/30/20 (completeness/validity/consistency),
+  los outliers penalizaban validity (con bug de escala) y consistency penalizaba
+  informatividad.
diff --git a/python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score.py b/python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score.py
index d16e9849..11d83988 100644
--- a/python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score.py
+++ b/python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score.py
@@ -1,34 +1,78 @@
 """Score de calidad de datos (0-100) para un ColumnProfile del grupo eda.
 
 Funcion pura: dado el perfil de una columna producido por el grupo de
-capacidad `eda` (p.ej. summarize_table_duckdb), calcula un score agregado
-de calidad junto a su desglose en completeness / validity / consistency y
-una lista de issues legibles. No realiza I/O ni muta el input.
+capacidad `eda` (p.ej. summarize_table_duckdb / profile_table), calcula un
+score agregado de calidad junto a su desglose por dimension y dos listas
+legibles separadas: `issues` (defectos de calidad reales que SI bajan el
+score) y `observations` (señales analiticas que NO bajan el score). No
+realiza I/O ni muta el input.
+
+Modelo (DAMA-DMBOK / ISO 8000), ver report 2046:
+
+- Solo entran en el score las dimensiones medibles automaticamente desde el
+  perfil, sin fuente externa de verdad: completeness y validity por columna.
+- Renormalizacion por aplicabilidad: si una dimension no es medible en la
+  columna (texto libre sin semantica -> validity no aplica; columna 100% nula
+  -> validity no medible), se excluye y los pesos se renormalizan sobre las
+  aplicables. Una columna ni se premia ni se castiga por algo no medible.
+- Sin doble conteo: la falta de datos cuenta solo en completeness (se elimino
+  el antiguo castigo extra de `mostly_null` sobre validity).
+- Los OUTLIERS NO bajan la calidad. Un valor extremo puede ser real y
+  correcto; detectar atipicos es analisis de la distribucion, no un juicio de
+  coreccion. Outliers, columnas constantes e identificadores de alta
+  cardinalidad pasan a `observations`, nunca a `issues`.
 """
 
 
+# Pesos base de las dimensiones de columna (se renormalizan por aplicabilidad).
+_W_COMPLETENESS = 0.6
+_W_VALIDITY = 0.4
+
+# Tipos inferidos cuyo almacen garantiza la conformidad de tipo (validity=1.0)
+# cuando NO vienen de una promocion de texto (en cuyo caso manda validity_rate).
+_NATIVE_TYPED = ("numeric", "integer", "float", "datetime", "date", "boolean", "bool")
+
+
 def column_quality_score(col: dict) -> dict:
     """Calcula un score de calidad de datos 0-100 para un ColumnProfile.
 
-    El score pondera tres dimensiones:
-      - completeness (0.5): proporcion de valores no nulos.
-      - validity     (0.3): ausencia de outliers / heuristicas de validez.
-      - consistency  (0.2): la columna aporta informacion (no constante, no ruido).
+    El score combina solo dimensiones de calidad medibles desde el perfil, con
+    renormalizacion por aplicabilidad:
+
+      - completeness (peso base 0.6, siempre aplica): proporcion de valores
+        presentes = 1 - null_pct. En texto, las celdas vacias (`empty_count`)
+        tambien cuentan como faltantes.
+      - validity (peso base 0.4, cuando hay un criterio de validacion real):
+        fraccion de valores no nulos conformes a su tipo/semantica. Tipo nativo
+        numerico/fecha/bool = 1.0; texto promovido a numero/fecha = parse rate
+        (`validity_rate`); texto con `semantic_type` regexable = `match_rate`;
+        texto libre o columna 100% nula = NO aplicable (renormaliza a solo
+        completeness).
+
+    Los outliers, columnas constantes, identificadores y asimetria fuerte NO
+    bajan el score: se devuelven en `observations`.
 
     Args:
         col: ColumnProfile dict del grupo eda. Se leen las claves de forma
             defensiva con .get(...) y se tolera que muchas vengan en None.
-            Claves relevantes: null_pct, inferred_type, semantic_type,
-            unique_pct, flags (list[str]), numeric ({outlier_pct, ...}|None),
-            match_rate (opcional).
+            Claves relevantes: null_pct (0-1), n_rows, empty_count,
+            inferred_type, semantic_type, validity_rate (0-1, lo expone
+            profile_table al promocionar texto a numero/fecha), match_rate
+            (0-1), unique_pct (0-1), flags (list[str], reconoce
+            "constant"/"possible_id"/"high_cardinality"), numeric
+            ({outlier_pct: 0-100, skew, ...}|None).
 
     Returns:
         dict con:
-          score        (float, 0-100, redondeado a 1 decimal),
-          completeness (float, 0-1),
-          validity     (float, 0-1),
-          consistency  (float, 0-1),
-          issues       (list[str]) descripciones legibles de los problemas.
+          score        (float 0-100, redondeado a 1 decimal),
+          completeness (float 0-1),
+          validity     (float 0-1 | None si no aplicable),
+          dimensions   ({completeness, validity}),
+          applicable   (list[str] de dimensiones que entraron en el score),
+          issues       (list[str]) SOLO defectos de calidad (nulos, vacios,
+                       valores no conformes a su tipo/semantica),
+          observations (list[str]) señales analiticas que NO bajan el score
+                       (outliers, columna constante, posible id, asimetria).
     """
     if not isinstance(col, dict):
         col = {}
@@ -39,103 +83,153 @@ def column_quality_score(col: dict) -> dict:
     flags = set(flags)
 
     issues: list[str] = []
+    observations: list[str] = []
+
+    inferred_type = col.get("inferred_type") or ""
+    semantic_type = col.get("semantic_type") or ""
 
     # --- completeness -------------------------------------------------
-    null_pct = col.get("null_pct")
-    if null_pct is None:
-        null_pct = 0.0
-    try:
-        null_pct = float(null_pct)
-    except (TypeError, ValueError):
-        null_pct = 0.0
-    null_pct = _clamp(null_pct, 0.0, 1.0)
+    # Falta de datos = nulos + (en texto) celdas vacias. Es el unico sitio
+    # donde la falta de datos cuenta: nunca se duplica en validity.
+    null_pct = _clamp(_num(col.get("null_pct"), 0.0), 0.0, 1.0)
     completeness = 1.0 - null_pct
     if null_pct > 0:
-        issues.append(f"{round(null_pct * 100)}% nulos")
+        issues.append(f"{_pct(null_pct)} nulos")
 
-    # --- validity -----------------------------------------------------
-    validity = 1.0
-    inferred_type = col.get("inferred_type") or ""
+    empty_frac = 0.0
+    n_rows = col.get("n_rows")
+    empty_count = col.get("empty_count")
+    if (
+        isinstance(n_rows, (int, float)) and not isinstance(n_rows, bool) and n_rows > 0
+        and isinstance(empty_count, (int, float)) and not isinstance(empty_count, bool)
+        and empty_count > 0
+    ):
+        empty_frac = _clamp(float(empty_count) / float(n_rows), 0.0, 1.0)
+        completeness = _clamp(completeness - empty_frac, 0.0, 1.0)
+        issues.append(f"{_pct(empty_frac)} vacíos")
 
-    numeric = col.get("numeric")
-    is_numeric = inferred_type in ("integer", "float", "numeric") or isinstance(numeric, dict)
-    if isinstance(numeric, dict):
-        outlier_pct = numeric.get("outlier_pct")
-        if outlier_pct is not None:
-            try:
-                outlier_pct = float(outlier_pct)
-            except (TypeError, ValueError):
-                outlier_pct = 0.0
-            outlier_pct = _clamp(outlier_pct, 0.0, 1.0)
-            if outlier_pct > 0:
-                penalty = min(outlier_pct, 0.3)
-                validity -= penalty
-                issues.append(f"{round(outlier_pct * 100)}% outliers")
-
-    # semantic_type declarado pero con baja tasa de match (si la conocemos).
-    semantic_type = col.get("semantic_type") or ""
-    match_rate = col.get("match_rate")
-    if semantic_type and match_rate is not None:
-        try:
-            match_rate = float(match_rate)
-        except (TypeError, ValueError):
-            match_rate = None
-        if match_rate is not None:
-            match_rate = _clamp(match_rate, 0.0, 1.0)
-            if match_rate < 1.0:
-                shortfall = 1.0 - match_rate
-                validity -= 0.5 * shortfall
-                issues.append(
-                    f"semantic_type '{semantic_type}' con baja coincidencia "
-                    f"({round(match_rate * 100)}%)"
-                )
-
-    if "mostly_null" in flags:
-        validity *= 0.5
-        issues.append("mayoritariamente nula")
-
-    validity = _clamp(validity, 0.0, 1.0)
-
-    # --- consistency --------------------------------------------------
-    consistency = 1.0
-    if "constant" in flags:
-        consistency = 0.3
-        issues.append("columna constante")
+    # --- validity (con renormalizacion por aplicabilidad) -------------
+    # None = no medible -> se excluye del score (no penaliza ni premia).
+    validity = None
+    if completeness <= 0.0:
+        # Columna 100% faltante: no hay valores no nulos sobre los que medir
+        # conformidad. validity no aplica -> el score sale solo de completeness
+        # (= 0). Es el peor defecto de calidad posible.
+        validity = None
     else:
-        unique_pct = col.get("unique_pct")
-        if unique_pct is not None:
-            try:
-                unique_pct = float(unique_pct)
-            except (TypeError, ValueError):
-                unique_pct = None
-        if (
-            inferred_type == "text"
+        validity_rate = col.get("validity_rate")
+        match_rate = col.get("match_rate")
+        if validity_rate is not None:
+            # Texto promovido a numero/fecha: parse rate real de la muestra.
+            v = _num(validity_rate, None)
+            if v is not None:
+                validity = _clamp(v, 0.0, 1.0)
+                if validity < 1.0:
+                    kind = (
+                        "número" if inferred_type == "numeric"
+                        else "fecha" if inferred_type == "datetime"
+                        else inferred_type or "su tipo"
+                    )
+                    issues.append(
+                        f"{_pct(1.0 - validity)} no parsea al tipo {kind}"
+                    )
+        elif inferred_type in _NATIVE_TYPED:
+            # Tipo nativo garantizado por el almacen: no hay valores que no
+            # parseen. validity = 1.0 (no se confunde con tener outliers).
+            validity = 1.0
+        elif semantic_type and match_rate is not None:
+            v = _num(match_rate, None)
+            if v is not None:
+                validity = _clamp(v, 0.0, 1.0)
+                if validity < 1.0:
+                    issues.append(
+                        f"{_pct(1.0 - validity)} no casa con el "
+                        f"formato «{semantic_type}»"
+                    )
+        else:
+            # Texto libre / categorica sin semantica: no hay criterio honesto
+            # de validez. No aplica.
+            validity = None
+
+    # --- observations (NO bajan el score) -----------------------------
+    numeric = col.get("numeric")
+    if isinstance(numeric, dict):
+        # outlier_pct viene en escala 0-100 desde describe_numeric (z-score>3).
+        outlier_pct = _num(numeric.get("outlier_pct"), None)
+        if outlier_pct is not None and outlier_pct >= 0.05:
+            observations.append(
+                f"{_pct(outlier_pct / 100.0)} de valores atípicos (z-score>3): "
+                "revisar si son errores u observaciones legítimas"
+            )
+        skew = _num(numeric.get("skew"), None)
+        if skew is not None and abs(skew) >= 1.0:
+            observations.append(
+                f"asimetría fuerte (skew={round(skew, 2)}): considerar "
+                "re-expresión antes de modelar"
+            )
+
+    if "constant" in flags:
+        observations.append(
+            "columna constante: aporta poca información para el análisis"
+        )
+
+    unique_pct = _num(col.get("unique_pct"), None)
+    is_id = (
+        "possible_id" in flags
+        or "high_cardinality" in flags
+        or (
+            inferred_type in ("text", "categorical")
             and unique_pct is not None
             and _clamp(unique_pct, 0.0, 1.0) > 0.9
-        ):
-            consistency = 0.6
-            issues.append("posible id de alta cardinalidad")
-
-    consistency = _clamp(consistency, 0.0, 1.0)
-
-    # --- score agregado ----------------------------------------------
-    score = round(
-        100.0 * (0.5 * completeness + 0.3 * validity + 0.2 * consistency),
-        1,
+        )
     )
+    if is_id:
+        observations.append(
+            "valores casi únicos: posible identificador (no es un defecto de calidad)"
+        )
 
-    # Silencia warnings sobre la variable de tipo no usada.
-    _ = is_numeric
+    # --- score agregado con renormalizacion ---------------------------
+    applicable = ["completeness"]
+    num = _W_COMPLETENESS * completeness
+    den = _W_COMPLETENESS
+    if validity is not None:
+        applicable.append("validity")
+        num += _W_VALIDITY * validity
+        den += _W_VALIDITY
+    score = round(100.0 * num / den, 1) if den > 0 else 0.0
 
     return {
         "score": score,
         "completeness": completeness,
         "validity": validity,
-        "consistency": consistency,
+        "dimensions": {"completeness": completeness, "validity": validity},
+        "applicable": applicable,
         "issues": issues,
+        "observations": observations,
     }
 
 
+def _pct(frac: float) -> str:
+    """Formatea una fraccion 0-1 como porcentaje honesto: «N%» si >=1%, «0.N%»
+    por debajo (para no mostrar «0%» cuando hay un defecto real pequeño)."""
+    p = frac * 100.0
+    if p >= 1.0:
+        return f"{round(p)}%"
+    return f"{p:.1f}%"
+
+
+def _num(x, default):
+    """Convierte x a float; devuelve `default` si es None o no parseable."""
+    if x is None:
+        return default
+    if isinstance(x, bool):
+        return default
+    try:
+        return float(x)
+    except (TypeError, ValueError):
+        return default
+
+
 def _clamp(x: float, lo: float, hi: float) -> float:
     """Recorta x al rango [lo, hi]."""
     if x < lo:
diff --git a/python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score_test.py b/python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score_test.py
index 6ed0d7e2..6f862ec6 100644
--- a/python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score_test.py
+++ b/python/functions/datascience/column_quality_score_test.py
@@ -1,4 +1,12 @@
-"""Tests para column_quality_score."""
+"""Tests para column_quality_score (nueva fórmula, report 2046).
+
+Verifica las invariantes de la fórmula de calidad:
+  - completeness (0.6) + validity (0.4) con renormalización por aplicabilidad.
+  - Los OUTLIERS no bajan el score (van a observations, no a issues).
+  - Columnas constantes e ids no bajan el score (observations).
+  - Sin doble conteo de la falta de datos.
+  - all-null -> score 0; función pura (no muta el input).
+"""
 
 import os
 import sys
@@ -9,11 +17,11 @@ from column_quality_score import column_quality_score
 
 
 def _clean_numeric_col() -> dict:
-    """ColumnProfile de una columna numerica sana, sin problemas."""
+    """ColumnProfile de una columna numérica nativa sana, sin problemas."""
     return {
         "name": "edad",
         "physical_type": "INTEGER",
-        "inferred_type": "integer",
+        "inferred_type": "numeric",
         "semantic_type": "",
         "count": 1000,
         "n_rows": 1000,
@@ -28,85 +36,163 @@ def _clean_numeric_col() -> dict:
     }
 
 
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# Golden
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
 def test_clean_column_high_score():
     out = column_quality_score(_clean_numeric_col())
-    assert out["score"] > 90
+    assert out["score"] == 100.0
     assert out["completeness"] == 1.0
     assert out["validity"] == 1.0
-    assert out["consistency"] == 1.0
+    assert out["applicable"] == ["completeness", "validity"]
     assert out["issues"] == []
+    assert out["observations"] == []
 
 
-def test_half_null_lowers_completeness_and_score():
+def test_weights_60_40_native_type():
+    """30% nulos en numérica nativa: score = 100*(0.6*0.7 + 0.4*1.0) = 82."""
     col = _clean_numeric_col()
-    col["null_count"] = 500
-    col["null_pct"] = 0.5
-    clean_score = column_quality_score(_clean_numeric_col())["score"]
+    col["null_pct"] = 0.30
+    col["null_count"] = 300
     out = column_quality_score(col)
-    assert out["completeness"] == 0.5
-    assert out["score"] < clean_score
-    assert any("nulos" in issue for issue in out["issues"])
+    assert out["completeness"] == 0.7
+    assert out["validity"] == 1.0
+    assert out["score"] == 82.0
+    assert any("nulos" in i for i in out["issues"])
 
 
-def test_constant_column_flags_issue():
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# Outliers FUERA del score
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_outliers_do_not_penalize_score():
+    """Columna con outliers pero sin nulos -> score máximo; outliers en observations."""
+    col = _clean_numeric_col()
+    col["numeric"] = {"outlier_pct": 18.0, "skew": 0.2}  # 18% atípicos (escala 0-100)
+    out = column_quality_score(col)
+    assert out["score"] == 100.0  # los outliers NO bajan la calidad
+    assert out["validity"] == 1.0
+    # No aparecen como problema de calidad...
+    assert not any("atípic" in i or "outlier" in i for i in out["issues"])
+    # ...sino como observación analítica.
+    assert any("atípic" in o for o in out["observations"])
+
+
+def test_nulls_lower_score_more_than_outliers():
+    """Vacíos sí penalizan; outliers no: comparar las dos columnas."""
+    con_nulos = _clean_numeric_col()
+    con_nulos["null_pct"] = 0.30
+    con_outliers = _clean_numeric_col()
+    con_outliers["numeric"] = {"outlier_pct": 30.0}
+    assert column_quality_score(con_nulos)["score"] < \
+        column_quality_score(con_outliers)["score"]
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# Validity: aplicabilidad y renormalización
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_validity_from_parse_rate_lowers_score():
+    """Numérica como texto con 20% basura: validity=0.8 -> score=92."""
+    col = {
+        "name": "precio_txt", "inferred_type": "numeric", "semantic_type": "decimal",
+        "null_pct": 0.0, "validity_rate": 0.80, "flags": [], "numeric": None,
+    }
+    out = column_quality_score(col)
+    assert out["validity"] == 0.8
+    assert out["score"] == 92.0  # 100*(0.6 + 0.4*0.8)
+    assert any("no parsea" in i for i in out["issues"])
+
+
+def test_validity_from_match_rate():
+    """Texto con semantic_type y 5% no conforme: validity=0.95."""
+    col = {
+        "name": "email", "inferred_type": "text", "semantic_type": "email",
+        "null_pct": 0.0, "match_rate": 0.95, "unique_pct": 0.5, "flags": [],
+    }
+    out = column_quality_score(col)
+    assert out["validity"] == 0.95
+    assert out["score"] == 98.0  # 100*(0.6 + 0.4*0.95)
+    assert any("no casa" in i for i in out["issues"])
+
+
+def test_free_text_renormalizes_to_completeness_only():
+    """Texto libre sin semántica: validity no aplica -> score = 100*completeness."""
+    col = {
+        "name": "comentario", "inferred_type": "text", "semantic_type": "",
+        "null_pct": 0.30, "unique_pct": 0.5, "flags": [], "numeric": None,
+    }
+    out = column_quality_score(col)
+    assert out["validity"] is None
+    assert out["applicable"] == ["completeness"]
+    assert out["completeness"] == 0.7
+    assert out["score"] == 70.0  # renormalizado a solo completeness
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# Casos límite (report §4.6)
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_all_null_column_scores_zero():
+    col = _clean_numeric_col()
+    col["null_pct"] = 1.0
+    col["null_count"] = 1000
+    out = column_quality_score(col)
+    assert out["completeness"] == 0.0
+    assert out["validity"] is None  # no medible sin valores no nulos
+    assert out["score"] == 0.0
+
+
+def test_constant_column_scores_full_and_is_observation():
+    """Columna constante: dato válido y completo -> score 100; baja info = observación."""
     col = _clean_numeric_col()
     col["flags"] = ["constant"]
     col["distinct_count"] = 1
     col["unique_pct"] = 0.001
     out = column_quality_score(col)
-    assert out["consistency"] == 0.3
-    assert any("constante" in issue for issue in out["issues"])
+    assert out["score"] == 100.0  # NO se castiga la baja informatividad
+    assert not any("constante" in i for i in out["issues"])
+    assert any("constante" in o for o in out["observations"])
 
 
+def test_high_cardinality_id_scores_full_and_is_observation():
+    """Id de alta cardinalidad: unicidad perfecta -> score 100; posible id = observación."""
+    col = {
+        "name": "uuid", "inferred_type": "text", "semantic_type": "",
+        "null_pct": 0.0, "unique_pct": 0.99, "flags": ["possible_id"],
+        "numeric": None,
+    }
+    out = column_quality_score(col)
+    assert out["score"] == 100.0
+    assert not any("identificador" in i for i in out["issues"])
+    assert any("identificador" in o for o in out["observations"])
+
+
+def test_mostly_null_no_double_counts_validity():
+    """85% nulos: solo completeness penaliza; validity nativa sigue 1.0 (sin doble castigo)."""
+    col = _clean_numeric_col()
+    col["null_pct"] = 0.85
+    col["flags"] = ["mostly_null"]
+    out = column_quality_score(col)
+    assert out["validity"] == 1.0  # ya no se multiplica por 0.5
+    # score = 100*(0.6*0.15 + 0.4*1.0) = 49
+    assert out["score"] == 49.0
+    assert not any("mayoritariamente" in o for o in out["observations"])
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# Robustez
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
 def test_empty_dict_does_not_crash():
     out = column_quality_score({})
     assert isinstance(out["score"], float)
     assert out["completeness"] == 1.0
     assert 0.0 <= out["score"] <= 100.0
     assert isinstance(out["issues"], list)
-
-
-def test_outliers_penalize_validity():
-    col = _clean_numeric_col()
-    col["numeric"] = {"outlier_pct": 0.2}
-    out = column_quality_score(col)
-    assert out["validity"] < 1.0
-    assert any("outliers" in issue for issue in out["issues"])
-
-
-def test_mostly_null_flag_halves_validity():
-    col = _clean_numeric_col()
-    col["null_pct"] = 0.85
-    col["flags"] = ["mostly_null"]
-    out = column_quality_score(col)
-    assert out["validity"] == 0.5
-    assert any("mayoritariamente nula" in issue for issue in out["issues"])
-
-
-def test_high_cardinality_text_flagged_as_id():
-    col = {
-        "name": "uuid",
-        "inferred_type": "text",
-        "semantic_type": "",
-        "null_pct": 0.0,
-        "unique_pct": 0.99,
-        "flags": [],
-        "numeric": None,
-    }
-    out = column_quality_score(col)
-    assert out["consistency"] < 1.0
-    assert any("alta cardinalidad" in issue for issue in out["issues"])
+    assert isinstance(out["observations"], list)
 
 
 def test_none_values_treated_defensively():
     col = {
-        "name": "x",
-        "inferred_type": None,
-        "semantic_type": None,
-        "null_pct": None,
-        "unique_pct": None,
-        "flags": None,
-        "numeric": None,
+        "name": "x", "inferred_type": None, "semantic_type": None,
+        "null_pct": None, "unique_pct": None, "flags": None, "numeric": None,
     }
     out = column_quality_score(col)
     assert out["completeness"] == 1.0
diff --git a/python/functions/datascience/summarize_table_duckdb.md b/python/functions/datascience/summarize_table_duckdb.md
index e9c9213f..006e61bc 100644
--- a/python/functions/datascience/summarize_table_duckdb.md
+++ b/python/functions/datascience/summarize_table_duckdb.md
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ name: summarize_table_duckdb
 kind: function
 lang: py
 domain: datascience
-version: "1.0.0"
+version: "1.1.0"
 purity: impure
 signature: "def summarize_table_duckdb(db_path: str, table: str, high_card_ratio: float = 0.9) -> dict"
 description: "Perfila una tabla DuckDB en una sola pasada SQL (SUMMARIZE, push-down sin traer filas a RAM) y devuelve el esqueleto de un TableProfile con el perfil base por columna. Corazon del grupo eda: base barata sobre la que otras funciones anaden lo estadistico fino (skew/kurtosis/histograma sobre muestra)."
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ else:
 - **`distinct_count` exacto para tablas <=200k filas, aproximado+capado por encima**: `SUMMARIZE` usa HyperLogLog (`approx_unique`), que SOBREESTIMA y en tablas pequenas puede reportar mas distintos que filas (inflando `unique_pct` por encima de 1.0 y disparando flags `possible_id` falsos). Por eso, para `n_rows <= 200000` la funcion calcula `COUNT(DISTINCT)` EXACTO en una sola query combinada (barata) y usa ese valor. Para tablas mas grandes mantiene `approx_unique` pero lo CAPA a `n_rows` (`distinct_count = min(approx_unique, n_rows)`). En ambos casos `unique_pct = min(distinct_count / n_rows, 1.0)`, asi que `distinct_count` nunca supera las filas ni `unique_pct` pasa de 1.0. Los flags `possible_id` / `high_cardinality` derivan de ese `distinct_count` ya corregido (exacto y fiable por debajo de 200k filas; aproximado y conservador por encima).
 - **`SUMMARIZE` NO da skew, kurtosis ni histograma**, ni percentiles finos (p1/p5/p95/p99), moda, outliers, correlaciones, key_candidates ni quality_score. Esas claves quedan en `None`/`[]` a proposito: las rellena otra funcion del grupo `eda` sobre una muestra. El sub-dict `numeric` solo trae min, max, mean, std, p25, p50, p75.
 - **`SUMMARIZE.count` es el total de filas, no el no-nulo**: la funcion deriva el `count` no-nulo del ColumnProfile como `n_rows - null_count` (con `null_count` redondeado de `null_percentage`).
+- **`duplicate_rows`/`duplicate_pct` se pueblan push-down** (desde v1.1.0) con `count(*)` sobre `SELECT DISTINCT *` (sin traer filas a RAM): `duplicate_rows = n_rows - filas_distintas`, `duplicate_pct` en fraccion 0-1. Habilitan la dimension de unicidad de registro del score de dataset (`profile_table` paso 6). Si la tabla tiene tipos no comparables con `DISTINCT` (BLOB/LIST/MAP) la query degrada y ambas vuelven a `None` (renormaliza el score a solo `cell_quality`).
 - **min/max/avg/std/q25/q50/q75 vienen como strings** desde DuckDB; se convierten a float (None si la columna no es numerica).
 - **Requiere DuckDB 1.5.2** (columnas de `SUMMARIZE` validadas con esa version: column_name, column_type, min, max, approx_unique, avg, std, q25, q50, q75, count, null_percentage).
 - **El identificador de tabla se interpola** (no parametrizable en `SUMMARIZE`): por eso se valida contra `^[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*$` antes de citarlo. Un nombre invalido (p.ej. con `;` o espacios) devuelve `{status:'error'}` sin tocar la base.
diff --git a/python/functions/datascience/summarize_table_duckdb.py b/python/functions/datascience/summarize_table_duckdb.py
index 641c230f..93e5ebb1 100644
--- a/python/functions/datascience/summarize_table_duckdb.py
+++ b/python/functions/datascience/summarize_table_duckdb.py
@@ -196,6 +196,21 @@ def summarize_table_duckdb(
             sum(c["null_pct"] for c in columns) / len(columns) if columns else 0.0
         )
 
+        # Unicidad de registro: filas duplicadas via COUNT de filas distintas
+        # push-down (DISTINCT *), sin traer filas a RAM. Habilita la dimension
+        # de uniqueness del score de dataset (1 - duplicate_pct). Degrada a None
+        # si la tabla tiene tipos no comparables con DISTINCT (BLOB/LIST/MAP).
+        duplicate_rows = None
+        duplicate_pct = None
+        if n_rows > 0:
+            dup_res = duckdb_query_readonly(
+                db_path, f"SELECT count(*) AS c FROM (SELECT DISTINCT * FROM {quoted})"
+            )
+            if dup_res["status"] == "ok" and dup_res["rows"]:
+                distinct_rows = int(dup_res["rows"][0]["c"])
+                duplicate_rows = max(0, n_rows - distinct_rows)
+                duplicate_pct = duplicate_rows / n_rows  # fraccion 0-1
+
         profile = {
             "table": table,
             "source": "duckdb",
@@ -203,8 +218,8 @@ def summarize_table_duckdb(
             "n_rows": n_rows,
             "n_cols": len(columns),
             "size_bytes": None,
-            "duplicate_rows": None,
-            "duplicate_pct": None,
+            "duplicate_rows": duplicate_rows,
+            "duplicate_pct": duplicate_pct,
             "constant_cols": constant_cols,
             "all_null_cols": all_null_cols,
             "null_cell_pct": null_cell_pct,
diff --git a/python/functions/datascience/summarize_table_duckdb_test.py b/python/functions/datascience/summarize_table_duckdb_test.py
index 57ff5485..ad8f9578 100644
--- a/python/functions/datascience/summarize_table_duckdb_test.py
+++ b/python/functions/datascience/summarize_table_duckdb_test.py
@@ -54,6 +54,30 @@ def test_shape_y_metadatos_tabla(db):
     assert profile["correlations"] is None
 
 
+def test_duplicate_pct_sin_duplicados(db):
+    """Tabla con todas las filas distintas: duplicate_pct = 0, no None."""
+    profile = summarize_table_duckdb(db, "ventas")["profile"]
+    assert profile["duplicate_rows"] == 0
+    assert profile["duplicate_pct"] == 0.0
+
+
+def test_duplicate_pct_con_duplicados(tmp_path):
+    """Filas repetidas: duplicate_rows/duplicate_pct se pueblan push-down."""
+    path = str(tmp_path / "dups.duckdb")
+    con = duckdb.connect(path)
+    con.execute("CREATE TABLE t (a INTEGER, b VARCHAR)")
+    # 5 filas, 2 de ellas idénticas a otras -> 2 duplicadas sobre 5 = 0.4.
+    con.execute(
+        "INSERT INTO t VALUES "
+        "(1,'x'), (2,'y'), (1,'x'), (3,'z'), (2,'y')"
+    )
+    con.close()
+    profile = summarize_table_duckdb(path, "t")["profile"]
+    assert profile["n_rows"] == 5
+    assert profile["duplicate_rows"] == 2
+    assert profile["duplicate_pct"] == 0.4
+
+
 def test_column_profile_shape(db):
     profile = summarize_table_duckdb(db, "ventas")["profile"]
     by_name = {c["name"]: c for c in profile["columns"]}
diff --git a/python/functions/pipelines/profile_table.md b/python/functions/pipelines/profile_table.md
index 2808965a..82a7a406 100644
--- a/python/functions/pipelines/profile_table.md
+++ b/python/functions/pipelines/profile_table.md
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ kind: pipeline
 lang: py
 domain: pipelines
 purity: impure
-version: "1.0.0"
+version: "1.1.0"
 signature: "def profile_table(db_path: str, table: str, backend: str = \"duckdb\", sample: int = 5000, run_models: bool = False, run_llm: bool = False, run_series: bool = False, emit_pdf: bool = False, emit_automatic: bool = False, report_dir: str = \"reports\", write_report: bool = True) -> dict"
 description: "Orquestador one-shot del grupo de capacidad eda: perfila UNA tabla (DuckDB o PostgreSQL) end-to-end componiendo las funciones del grupo (perfil base SQL + muestreo read-only + inferencia semantica + promocion de tipo + estadistica numerica/categorica + score de calidad + correlaciones con correccion FDR + re-expresion de Tukey + avisos exploratorios) y, opcional, modelos baratos (run_models), interpretacion LLM (run_llm) y analisis de serie temporal por columna (run_series: estacionariedad ADF+KPSS, ACF/PACF, STL, retornos). Emite el TableProfile completo mas (opcional) report markdown + JSON sidecar + PDF movil (emit_pdf). Es la composicion canonica para hazme un EDA de esta tabla."
 tags: [eda, duckdb, postgres, profiling, data-quality, pipeline, dataops, timeseries]
@@ -114,3 +114,12 @@ para auditar la calidad de una tabla ya productiva. Reemplaza orquestar a mano
   Formatos exoticos pueden descartarse silenciosamente del calculo numerico.
 - `db_path` debe existir: DuckDB read-only NO crea la base. El muestreo usa el
   sandbox por defecto de `duckdb_query_readonly` (sin acceso a FS/red).
+- **Score de calidad (report 2046, desde v1.1.0).** Paso 5: cada columna recibe
+  `quality_score` de `column_quality_score` con la formula 60/40
+  (completeness/validity); al promocionar texto a numero/fecha se expone
+  `col["validity_rate"]` (parse rate de la muestra) para alimentar la dimension
+  validity. Paso 6: el score de dataset NO es la media simple — es
+  `100 * (0.85*cell_quality + 0.15*row_uniqueness)`, donde
+  `cell_quality = media(score_col/100)` y `row_uniqueness = 1 - duplicate_pct`.
+  Si `duplicate_pct` es `None` (backend sin calcularlo) el score se renormaliza
+  a solo `cell_quality`. Los outliers NO bajan el score (van a `observations`).
diff --git a/python/functions/pipelines/profile_table.py b/python/functions/pipelines/profile_table.py
index 8a0077af..17321805 100644
--- a/python/functions/pipelines/profile_table.py
+++ b/python/functions/pipelines/profile_table.py
@@ -477,9 +477,18 @@ def profile_table(
                     if vals and (len(ok) / len(vals)) >= _PROMOTE_MIN_PARSE:
                         col["inferred_type"] = "numeric"
                         inferred = "numeric"
+                        # Tasa de parseo real de la muestra: alimenta la
+                        # dimension validity de column_quality_score (fraccion
+                        # de valores conformes al tipo numerico promovido).
+                        col["validity_rate"] = len(ok) / len(vals)
                 elif semantic in _DATETIME_SEMANTIC:
                     col["inferred_type"] = "datetime"
                     inferred = "datetime"
+                    # Tasa de parseo de la muestra a fecha (mismo papel que el
+                    # parse rate numerico) para la dimension validity.
+                    parsed_dt = [_to_ordinal_days(v) for v in vals]
+                    ok_dt = [d for d in parsed_dt if d is not None]
+                    col["validity_rate"] = (len(ok_dt) / len(vals)) if vals else None
 
             # 4) Enriquecer segun el inferred_type final.
             if inferred == "numeric":
@@ -506,11 +515,36 @@ def profile_table(
             # 5) Score de calidad por columna.
             col["quality_score"] = column_quality_score(col).get("score")
 
-        # 6) Score agregado de la tabla (media de columnas).
+        # 6) Score agregado de la tabla (report 2046): NO media simple.
+        #   cell_quality   = media de los scores de columna, en [0,1].
+        #   row_uniqueness = 1 - duplicate_pct (unicidad de registro).
+        #   score = 100 * (0.85*cell_quality + 0.15*row_uniqueness).
+        # Renormaliza a solo cell_quality si duplicate_pct no se pudo calcular.
         scores = [
             c["quality_score"] for c in cols if c.get("quality_score") is not None
         ]
-        prof["quality_score"] = round(sum(scores) / len(scores), 1) if scores else None
+        if scores:
+            cell_quality = (sum(scores) / len(scores)) / 100.0
+            dup_pct = prof.get("duplicate_pct")
+            if dup_pct is not None:
+                try:
+                    d = float(dup_pct)
+                except (TypeError, ValueError):
+                    d = None
+            else:
+                d = None
+            if d is not None:
+                # Tolerar escala 0-100 por si algun backend la entrega asi.
+                if d > 1.0:
+                    d = d / 100.0
+                row_uniqueness = max(0.0, min(1.0, 1.0 - d))
+                prof["quality_score"] = round(
+                    100.0 * (0.85 * cell_quality + 0.15 * row_uniqueness), 1
+                )
+            else:
+                prof["quality_score"] = round(100.0 * cell_quality, 1)
+        else:
+            prof["quality_score"] = None
 
         # 7) Candidatos a clave.
         key_candidates = []