Files
fn_registry/python/functions/datascience/automatic_eda/chapters/calidad.py
T
egutierrez d412522db9 feat(eda): capítulo CALIDAD del AutomaticEDA (criterios + scores + problemas ES)
Añade el capítulo de calidad de datos al motor AutomaticEDA, siguiendo el
contrato de capítulos (build_calidad(profile, ctx) -> Chapter | None,
CHAPTER_VERSION). El capítulo responde lo que pidió el usuario, en español y
en formato de tabla:

- Intro "Cómo se calcula la calidad": explica los tres criterios y sus pesos
  (completitud 50%, validez 30%, consistencia 20%) antes de cualquier número,
  más una KVTable de resumen a nivel tabla (calidad global y agregados).
- Tabla "Scores por columna": score total más su desglose en completitud /
  validez / consistencia, ordenada de peor a mejor.
- Tabla "Problemas detectados": los issues en español por columna, separados de
  los flags de tipo. Cuando no hay problemas, una nota honesta.

Registry-first: el desglose y los issues NO se recalculan aquí; se consumen de
la función pura del registry column_quality_score (grupo eda), que ya deriva
{score, completeness, validity, consistency, issues} del ColumnProfile. El
capítulo es render-only y compone bloques del modelo; los renderers paginan las
tablas (parten por filas repitiendo cabecera) y envuelven celdas largas, de modo
que nada se corta en PDF ni en PPTX. La lista de issues por celda se acota a
160 caracteres con "(+N más)" para que una fila nunca crezca más que una página.

Test self-contained (sin DuckDB): golden con desglose + issues ES, edges
(None/{}/sin columnas -> None; perfil limpio -> nota), y anti-cortes (perfil de
22 columnas con nombres largos renderizado a PDF y PPTX: el nombre completo
sobrevive al envolverse, sin marcador de truncado).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 14:59:10 +02:00

267 lines
10 KiB
Python
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
"""Data-quality chapter (CALIDAD) for AutomaticEDA.
Builds the quality chapter from a ``TableProfile`` of the ``eda`` group. The
chapter answers, in Spanish and as tables, the three things the user asked for:
1. **En qué se basa la calidad** — an intro paragraph explaining the criteria and
their weights (completeness, validity, consistency) before any number, plus a
table-level summary (global score and aggregates).
2. **Scores por columna** — a table with, per column, the total quality score and
its breakdown into completeness / validity / consistency.
3. **Problemas en español** — a second table listing, per column, the readable
issues in Spanish (kept separate from the type ``flags``).
The breakdown and the issues are NOT recomputed here: they come from the registry
function ``column_quality_score`` (group ``eda``), which already derives
``{score, completeness, validity, consistency, issues}`` from the ColumnProfile.
This chapter is render-only — it consumes that function and lays the result out
as model blocks; the renderers paginate tables (splitting by rows, repeating the
header) and wrap long cells so nothing is ever cut.
Contract: build_<id>(profile, ctx) -> Chapter | None ; CHAPTER_VERSION = "x.y.z".
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from .. import model
# Reuse the registry's pure quality function (group ``eda``). Import defensively:
# if the package cannot be imported for any reason the chapter degrades to the
# per-column ``quality_score`` already present in the profile instead of failing.
try: # pragma: no cover - import wiring
from ...column_quality_score import column_quality_score as _column_quality_score
except Exception: # noqa: BLE001 - never let an import error abort the document.
_column_quality_score = None
CHAPTER_VERSION = "1.0.0"
CHAPTER_ID = "calidad"
CHAPTER_TITLE = "Calidad"
# Weights mirror column_quality_score: completeness 0.5, validity 0.3,
# consistency 0.2. Kept here only to render the human explanation; the actual
# numbers always come from the function so the two never drift in computation.
_CRITERIA_INTRO = (
"La calidad de cada columna es un score de 0 a 100 que combina tres "
"criterios, cada uno con un peso:\n\n"
"- **Completitud (peso 50%)**: proporción de valores presentes (sin nulos "
"ni vacíos). Una columna con muchos nulos baja de score.\n"
"- **Validez (peso 30%)**: los valores son coherentes con su tipo y rango "
"esperado (penaliza outliers y semánticas declaradas que no coinciden).\n"
"- **Consistencia (peso 20%)**: la columna aporta información útil (penaliza "
"columnas constantes o identificadores de cardinalidad muy alta).\n\n"
"Score = 100 × (0,5·completitud + 0,3·validez + 0,2·consistencia). "
"Los problemas detectados por columna se listan en español más abajo."
)
# Cap for the joined issues cell so a single row never grows taller than a page;
# the remainder is summarized as "(+N más)" instead of being silently dropped.
_ISSUES_MAXLEN = 160
def _fmt_score(value) -> str:
"""Format a 0-100 score as ``NN / 100`` (or a placeholder)."""
if value is None:
return ""
try:
num = float(value)
except (TypeError, ValueError):
return str(value)
if num != num: # NaN
return ""
text = f"{num:.1f}".rstrip("0").rstrip(".")
return f"{text} / 100"
def _fmt_unit_pct(value) -> str:
"""Format a 0-1 fraction as a percentage (``95%``)."""
if value is None:
return ""
try:
return f"{float(value) * 100:.0f}%"
except (TypeError, ValueError):
return str(value)
def _quality_of(col: dict) -> dict:
"""Return ``{score, completeness, validity, consistency, issues}`` for a column.
Uses the registry ``column_quality_score`` when available; otherwise falls
back to the per-column ``quality_score`` already in the profile (number only,
empty breakdown/issues). Never raises.
"""
if not isinstance(col, dict):
col = {}
if _column_quality_score is not None:
try:
res = _column_quality_score(col)
if isinstance(res, dict):
return res
except Exception: # noqa: BLE001 - degrade instead of aborting.
pass
# Fallback: only the final score is available pre-computed in the profile.
return {
"score": col.get("quality_score"),
"completeness": None,
"validity": None,
"consistency": None,
"issues": [],
}
def _join_issues(issues) -> str:
"""Join Spanish issue strings into one cell, truncating overly long lists.
The renderer wraps cell text, but a column with many long issues could make a
single row taller than a whole page; cap the length and append ``(+N más)``
so the count of hidden issues is honest rather than silently lost.
"""
if not isinstance(issues, (list, tuple)) or not issues:
return ""
parts = [model._safe_str(i).strip() for i in issues]
parts = [p for p in parts if p]
if not parts:
return ""
out = []
used = 0
for idx, part in enumerate(parts):
extra = len(part) + (2 if out else 0)
if used + extra > _ISSUES_MAXLEN and out:
remaining = len(parts) - idx
out.append(f"(+{remaining} más)")
return "; ".join(out)
out.append(part)
used += extra
return "; ".join(out)
def _columns_with_quality(profile: dict):
"""Yield ``(col, quality_dict)`` for every column dict in the profile."""
cols = profile.get("columns") or []
for c in cols:
if isinstance(c, dict):
yield c, _quality_of(c)
def _summary_block(profile: dict, evaluated: list):
"""Table-level KVTable: global score and quality aggregates."""
rows = []
score = profile.get("quality_score")
rows.append(("Calidad global", _fmt_score(score)))
rows.append(("Columnas evaluadas", str(len(evaluated))))
comps = [q.get("completeness") for _, q in evaluated
if isinstance(q.get("completeness"), (int, float))]
vals = [q.get("validity") for _, q in evaluated
if isinstance(q.get("validity"), (int, float))]
cons = [q.get("consistency") for _, q in evaluated
if isinstance(q.get("consistency"), (int, float))]
if comps:
rows.append(("Completitud media", _fmt_unit_pct(sum(comps) / len(comps))))
if vals:
rows.append(("Validez media", _fmt_unit_pct(sum(vals) / len(vals))))
if cons:
rows.append(("Consistencia media", _fmt_unit_pct(sum(cons) / len(cons))))
n_problem = sum(1 for _, q in evaluated if q.get("issues"))
rows.append(("Columnas con problemas", str(n_problem)))
# Extra table-wide quality signals already in the profile, when present.
dup_pct = profile.get("duplicate_pct")
if dup_pct is not None:
rows.append(("Filas duplicadas", _fmt_unit_pct_or_pct(dup_pct)))
null_cell_pct = profile.get("null_cell_pct")
if null_cell_pct is not None:
rows.append(("Celdas nulas (global)", _fmt_unit_pct_or_pct(null_cell_pct)))
constant_cols = profile.get("constant_cols")
if isinstance(constant_cols, (list, tuple)) and constant_cols:
rows.append(("Columnas constantes", str(len(constant_cols))))
all_null_cols = profile.get("all_null_cols")
if isinstance(all_null_cols, (list, tuple)) and all_null_cols:
rows.append(("Columnas 100% nulas", str(len(all_null_cols))))
return model.KVTable(rows=rows, title="Resumen de calidad")
def _fmt_unit_pct_or_pct(value) -> str:
"""Format a value that may be a 0-1 fraction or an already-0-100 percentage."""
try:
num = float(value)
except (TypeError, ValueError):
return model._safe_str(value)
if num != num: # NaN
return ""
pct = num * 100 if num <= 1.0 else num
text = f"{pct:.1f}".rstrip("0").rstrip(".")
return f"{text}%"
def _scores_block(evaluated: list):
"""DataTable with per-column score and its three-criteria breakdown."""
header = ["Columna", "Calidad", "Completitud", "Validez", "Consistencia"]
rows = []
# Worst columns first so the reader sees the problems at the top.
ordered = sorted(
evaluated,
key=lambda cq: (cq[1].get("score")
if isinstance(cq[1].get("score"), (int, float)) else 101.0),
)
for col, q in ordered:
rows.append([
col.get("name") or "(col)",
_fmt_score(q.get("score")),
_fmt_unit_pct(q.get("completeness")),
_fmt_unit_pct(q.get("validity")),
_fmt_unit_pct(q.get("consistency")),
])
if not rows:
return None
return model.DataTable(header=header, rows=rows,
title="Scores de calidad por columna",
note="0 = peor, 100 = mejor; ordenado de peor a mejor")
def _issues_block(evaluated: list):
"""DataTable listing Spanish issues per column, or a Note when there are none."""
header = ["Columna", "Problemas detectados (español)"]
rows = []
for col, q in evaluated:
joined = _join_issues(q.get("issues"))
if joined:
rows.append([col.get("name") or "(col)", joined])
if not rows:
return model.Note(
"No se detectaron problemas de calidad en las columnas evaluadas.")
return model.DataTable(header=header, rows=rows,
title="Problemas de calidad por columna")
def build_calidad(profile: dict, ctx: dict):
"""Build the data-quality Chapter, or None if the profile has no columns.
Reads everything defensively; returns ``None`` when there are no columns to
score (the chapter does not apply), and never raises on a malformed profile.
"""
profile = profile or {}
if not isinstance(profile, dict):
profile = {}
ctx = ctx or {}
evaluated = list(_columns_with_quality(profile))
if not evaluated:
return None # no columns to score -> chapter does not apply.
blocks = [
model.Heading(text="Cómo se calcula la calidad", level=2),
model.Markdown(text=_CRITERIA_INTRO),
_summary_block(profile, evaluated),
model.Heading(text="Scores por columna", level=2),
]
scores = _scores_block(evaluated)
if scores is not None:
blocks.append(scores)
blocks.append(model.Heading(text="Problemas detectados", level=2))
blocks.append(_issues_block(evaluated))
return model.Chapter(id=CHAPTER_ID, title=CHAPTER_TITLE,
version=CHAPTER_VERSION, blocks=blocks)