Files
fn_registry/python/functions/datascience/automatic_eda/chapters/calidad.py
T
egutierrez a2074a0167 feat(eda): nueva fórmula de calidad de datos (report 2046) + capítulo calidad
Implementa el modelo de calidad del report 2046 en el grupo eda.

Score de columna: 0.6·completeness + 0.4·validity con renormalización por
aplicabilidad (si la validez no es medible —texto libre o columna 100% nula— el
score se basa solo en completeness). Validez = conformidad real al tipo: nativo
numérico/fecha/bool = 1.0; texto promovido a número/fecha = parse rate
(validity_rate); texto con semantic_type = match_rate; texto libre = no aplica.

Outliers, columnas constantes e identificadores salen del score a un bloque de
observaciones analíticas (no son defectos de calidad). Se elimina el doble
conteo de la falta de datos (mostly_null ya no castiga validez) y el bug de
escala de outliers (que además ya no entran en el score).

Score de dataset: 100·(0.85·cell_quality + 0.15·row_uniqueness) en vez de la
media simple. Se pobla duplicate_rows/duplicate_pct push-down en
summarize_table_duckdb (COUNT sobre DISTINCT *, sin RAM) para habilitar la
unicidad de registro; renormaliza a solo cell_quality si no se puede calcular.

Capítulo calidad (v2.0.0): intro de dos dimensiones (60/40) que declara que los
outliers no bajan el score; tabla de scores Columna|Calidad|Completitud|Validez
(sin Consistencia, n/a cuando no aplica); DOS tablas separadas (Problemas de
calidad vs Observaciones analíticas); resumen con Unicidad de registro; glosario
clicable de completitud, validez, unicidad de registro y calidad de datos.

Verificado: 123 tests verdes (automatic_eda + render_automatic_eda +
column_quality_score + summarize_table_duckdb + profile_table). Golden EDA de
titanic (run_models+run_llm) con score recomputado a mano, outliers separados en
observaciones y glosario clicable (5 links GOTO en el PDF).

column_quality_score v2.0.0, summarize_table_duckdb v1.1.0, profile_table v1.1.0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 18:10:23 +02:00

386 lines
15 KiB
Python
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
"""Data-quality chapter (CALIDAD) for AutomaticEDA.
Builds the quality chapter from a ``TableProfile`` of the ``eda`` group. The
chapter implements the quality model of report 2046:
1. **En qué se basa la calidad** — an intro paragraph explaining the two scored
dimensions and their weights (completitud 60%, validez 40%) plus the
table-level row uniqueness, BEFORE any number, and stating explicitly that
outliers are reported as observations and do **not** lower the score. The
criteria terms (calidad de datos, completitud, validez, unicidad de registro)
are hooked into the shared glossary as clickable jumps.
2. **Scores por columna** — a table with, per column, the total quality score and
its breakdown into completeness / validity (no consistency dimension).
3. **Problemas de calidad** — a table listing ONLY real quality defects
(nulls, empty cells, values not conforming to their type/semantics).
4. **Observaciones analíticas** — a SEPARATE table for outliers, constant
columns, high-cardinality ids and strong skew, with an explicit note that
these do not affect the score.
The breakdown, issues and observations are NOT recomputed here: they come from
the registry function ``column_quality_score`` (group ``eda``), which derives
``{score, completeness, validity, dimensions, applicable, issues,
observations}`` from the ColumnProfile. This chapter is render-only.
Contract: build_<id>(profile, ctx) -> Chapter | None ; CHAPTER_VERSION = "x.y.z".
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from .. import model
# Reuse the registry's pure quality function (group ``eda``). Import defensively:
# if the package cannot be imported for any reason the chapter degrades to the
# per-column ``quality_score`` already present in the profile instead of failing.
try: # pragma: no cover - import wiring
from ...column_quality_score import column_quality_score as _column_quality_score
except Exception: # noqa: BLE001 - never let an import error abort the document.
_column_quality_score = None
CHAPTER_VERSION = "2.0.0"
CHAPTER_ID = "calidad"
CHAPTER_TITLE = "Calidad"
# Glossary terms this chapter explains (report 2046 §6). Registered in the shared
# collector and marked clickable on their first appearance (contract §11.1).
_TERMS = {
"calidad_datos": (
"Calidad de datos (score 0-100)",
"Mide hasta qué punto los datos están presentes y son utilizables tal "
"cual, no si son «buenos para el análisis». Se compone solo de "
"dimensiones medibles automáticamente desde el perfil de la tabla, sin "
"fuente externa de verdad: completitud (60%), validez (40%, cuando es "
"medible) y, a nivel de tabla, unicidad de registro. Los valores "
"atípicos NO bajan la calidad: se listan aparte como observaciones.",
),
"completitud": (
"Completitud",
"Proporción de valores realmente presentes en una columna (1 % de "
"nulos; en texto, las celdas vacías también cuentan como faltantes). Los "
"nulos y vacíos bajan el score porque falta información que debería "
"estar. Pesa el 60% del score de columna.",
),
"validez": (
"Validez",
"Proporción de valores que encajan con su tipo o formato esperado: un "
"número que parsea, una fecha legible, un email con forma de email. Los "
"valores que no parsean a su tipo bajan el score. Si la columna es texto "
"libre sin formato esperado, la validez no se puede medir y el score se "
"basa solo en la completitud. Pesa el 40% del score cuando es medible.",
),
"unicidad_registro": (
"Unicidad de registro",
"A nivel de tabla, las filas duplicadas restan calidad al conjunto "
"(1 % de filas duplicadas). Es distinta de que una columna no-clave "
"repita valores, que no es un defecto de calidad.",
),
}
# Cap for the joined cell so a single row never grows taller than a page; the
# remainder is summarized as "(+N más)" instead of being silently dropped.
_ISSUES_MAXLEN = 160
def _fmt_score(value) -> str:
"""Format a 0-100 score as ``NN / 100`` (or a placeholder)."""
if value is None:
return ""
try:
num = float(value)
except (TypeError, ValueError):
return str(value)
if num != num: # NaN
return ""
text = f"{num:.1f}".rstrip("0").rstrip(".")
return f"{text} / 100"
def _fmt_unit_pct(value) -> str:
"""Format a 0-1 fraction as a percentage (``95%``)."""
if value is None:
return ""
try:
return f"{float(value) * 100:.0f}%"
except (TypeError, ValueError):
return str(value)
def _fmt_validity(value) -> str:
"""Validity is ``None`` when not applicable: show ``n/a`` not a fake 0%."""
if value is None:
return "n/a"
return _fmt_unit_pct(value)
def _quality_of(col: dict) -> dict:
"""Return the quality dict for a column.
Uses the registry ``column_quality_score`` when available; otherwise falls
back to the per-column ``quality_score`` already in the profile (number only,
empty breakdown/issues/observations). Never raises.
"""
if not isinstance(col, dict):
col = {}
if _column_quality_score is not None:
try:
res = _column_quality_score(col)
if isinstance(res, dict):
return res
except Exception: # noqa: BLE001 - degrade instead of aborting.
pass
return {
"score": col.get("quality_score"),
"completeness": None,
"validity": None,
"issues": [],
"observations": [],
}
def _join_cells(items) -> str:
"""Join Spanish strings into one cell, truncating overly long lists.
The renderer wraps cell text, but a column with many long entries could make
a single row taller than a whole page; cap the length and append ``(+N más)``
so the count of hidden entries is honest rather than silently lost.
"""
if not isinstance(items, (list, tuple)) or not items:
return ""
parts = [model._safe_str(i).strip() for i in items]
parts = [p for p in parts if p]
if not parts:
return ""
out = []
used = 0
for idx, part in enumerate(parts):
extra = len(part) + (2 if out else 0)
if used + extra > _ISSUES_MAXLEN and out:
remaining = len(parts) - idx
out.append(f"(+{remaining} más)")
return "; ".join(out)
out.append(part)
used += extra
return "; ".join(out)
def _columns_with_quality(profile: dict):
"""Yield ``(col, quality_dict)`` for every column dict in the profile."""
cols = profile.get("columns") or []
for c in cols:
if isinstance(c, dict):
yield c, _quality_of(c)
def _fmt_unit_pct_or_pct(value) -> str:
"""Format a value that may be a 0-1 fraction or an already-0-100 percentage."""
try:
num = float(value)
except (TypeError, ValueError):
return model._safe_str(value)
if num != num: # NaN
return ""
pct = num * 100 if num <= 1.0 else num
text = f"{pct:.1f}".rstrip("0").rstrip(".")
return f"{text}%"
def _row_uniqueness(profile: dict):
"""Return row uniqueness (1 - duplicate_pct) in [0,1], or None if unknown."""
dup = profile.get("duplicate_pct")
if dup is None:
return None
try:
d = float(dup)
except (TypeError, ValueError):
return None
if d > 1.0: # tolerate a 0-100 scale
d = d / 100.0
return max(0.0, min(1.0, 1.0 - d))
def _summary_block(profile: dict, evaluated: list):
"""Table-level KVTable: global score and quality aggregates."""
rows = []
score = profile.get("quality_score")
rows.append(("Calidad global", _fmt_score(score)))
rows.append(("Columnas evaluadas", str(len(evaluated))))
comps = [q.get("completeness") for _, q in evaluated
if isinstance(q.get("completeness"), (int, float))]
vals = [q.get("validity") for _, q in evaluated
if isinstance(q.get("validity"), (int, float))]
if comps:
rows.append(("Completitud media", _fmt_unit_pct(sum(comps) / len(comps))))
if vals:
rows.append(("Validez media (donde aplica)",
_fmt_unit_pct(sum(vals) / len(vals))))
ru = _row_uniqueness(profile)
if ru is not None:
rows.append(("Unicidad de registro", _fmt_unit_pct(ru)))
n_problem = sum(1 for _, q in evaluated if q.get("issues"))
rows.append(("Columnas con problemas", str(n_problem)))
# Extra table-wide quality signals already in the profile, when present.
dup_pct = profile.get("duplicate_pct")
if dup_pct is not None:
rows.append(("Filas duplicadas", _fmt_unit_pct_or_pct(dup_pct)))
null_cell_pct = profile.get("null_cell_pct")
if null_cell_pct is not None:
rows.append(("Celdas nulas (global)", _fmt_unit_pct_or_pct(null_cell_pct)))
constant_cols = profile.get("constant_cols")
if isinstance(constant_cols, (list, tuple)) and constant_cols:
rows.append(("Columnas constantes", str(len(constant_cols))))
all_null_cols = profile.get("all_null_cols")
if isinstance(all_null_cols, (list, tuple)) and all_null_cols:
rows.append(("Columnas 100% nulas", str(len(all_null_cols))))
return model.KVTable(rows=rows, title="Resumen de calidad")
def _scores_block(evaluated: list):
"""DataTable with per-column score and its completeness/validity breakdown."""
header = ["Columna", "Calidad", "Completitud", "Validez"]
rows = []
# Worst columns first so the reader sees the problems at the top.
ordered = sorted(
evaluated,
key=lambda cq: (cq[1].get("score")
if isinstance(cq[1].get("score"), (int, float)) else 101.0),
)
for col, q in ordered:
rows.append([
col.get("name") or "(col)",
_fmt_score(q.get("score")),
_fmt_unit_pct(q.get("completeness")),
_fmt_validity(q.get("validity")),
])
if not rows:
return None
return model.DataTable(header=header, rows=rows,
title="Scores de calidad por columna",
note="0 = peor, 100 = mejor; «n/a» = dimensión no "
"medible; ordenado de peor a mejor")
def _issues_block(evaluated: list):
"""DataTable listing ONLY real quality defects per column, or a Note."""
header = ["Columna", "Problemas de calidad (español)"]
rows = []
for col, q in evaluated:
joined = _join_cells(q.get("issues"))
if joined:
rows.append([col.get("name") or "(col)", joined])
if not rows:
return model.Note(
"No se detectaron problemas de calidad en las columnas evaluadas.")
return model.DataTable(header=header, rows=rows,
title="Problemas de calidad por columna")
def _observations_block(evaluated: list):
"""DataTable listing analytical observations per column, or None.
Observations (outliers, constant columns, ids, strong skew) are NOT quality
defects: they do not affect the score. Returned as a separate table from the
issues so the report never presents a legitimate outlier as a problem.
"""
header = ["Columna", "Observaciones analíticas"]
rows = []
for col, q in evaluated:
joined = _join_cells(q.get("observations"))
if joined:
rows.append([col.get("name") or "(col)", joined])
if not rows:
return None
return model.DataTable(
header=header, rows=rows,
title="Observaciones analíticas por columna",
note="No son defectos de calidad y NO afectan al score; orientan el "
"análisis (atípicos, columnas constantes, identificadores).")
def _term(key: str, label: str, mark: bool) -> str:
"""Render a term as a clickable glossary span when marking is enabled."""
if mark:
return f"[[term:{key}]]**{label}**[[/term]]"
return f"**{label}**"
def _criteria_intro(mark: bool) -> str:
"""Intro paragraph explaining the two scored dimensions and the principle."""
calidad = _term("calidad_datos", "calidad de datos", mark)
completitud = _term("completitud", "Completitud (peso 60%)", mark)
validez = _term("validez", "Validez (peso 40%, cuando es medible)", mark)
unicidad = _term("unicidad_registro", "unicidad de registro", mark)
return (
f"La {calidad} de cada columna es un score de 0 a 100 que combina solo "
"dimensiones medibles desde el perfil de la tabla, sin fuente externa "
"de verdad:\n\n"
f"- {completitud}: proporción de valores presentes (1 % de nulos; en "
"texto, las celdas vacías cuentan como faltantes). Los nulos y vacíos "
"bajan el score.\n"
f"- {validez}: proporción de valores que encajan con su tipo o formato "
"(un número que parsea, una fecha legible, un email con forma de email). "
"Si una columna es texto libre sin formato esperado, la validez no se "
"mide y el score se basa solo en la completitud.\n\n"
f"Score de columna = 100 × (0,6·completitud + 0,4·validez), "
"renormalizado cuando la validez no aplica. A nivel de tabla se añade "
f"la {unicidad} (1 % de filas duplicadas).\n\n"
"**Los valores atípicos (outliers) NO bajan la calidad.** Un valor "
"extremo puede ser real y correcto; detectar atípicos es parte del "
"análisis de la distribución, no un juicio de corrección. Por eso, junto "
"con las columnas constantes y los identificadores, se listan aparte "
"como **observaciones analíticas** que no afectan al score."
)
def build_calidad(profile: dict, ctx: dict):
"""Build the data-quality Chapter, or None if the profile has no columns.
Reads everything defensively; returns ``None`` when there are no columns to
score (the chapter does not apply), and never raises on a malformed profile.
"""
profile = profile or {}
if not isinstance(profile, dict):
profile = {}
ctx = ctx or {}
evaluated = list(_columns_with_quality(profile))
if not evaluated:
return None # no columns to score -> chapter does not apply.
# Register the criteria terms in the shared glossary (if present) and mark
# their first appearance clickable. Contract §11.1.
glossary = ctx.get("glossary")
mark = False
if isinstance(glossary, model.GlossaryCollector):
for key, (label, definition) in _TERMS.items():
glossary.add(key, label, definition)
mark = True
blocks = [
model.Heading(text="Cómo se calcula la calidad", level=2),
model.Markdown(text=_criteria_intro(mark)),
_summary_block(profile, evaluated),
model.Heading(text="Scores por columna", level=2),
]
scores = _scores_block(evaluated)
if scores is not None:
blocks.append(scores)
blocks.append(model.Heading(text="Problemas de calidad", level=2))
blocks.append(_issues_block(evaluated))
observations = _observations_block(evaluated)
if observations is not None:
blocks.append(model.Heading(text="Observaciones analíticas", level=2))
blocks.append(model.Note(
"Las observaciones siguientes NO son defectos de calidad y no "
"afectan al score: son señales para orientar el análisis."))
blocks.append(observations)
return model.Chapter(id=CHAPTER_ID, title=CHAPTER_TITLE,
version=CHAPTER_VERSION, blocks=blocks)